I. The rest of
the story on: Lake
O’Hara
278. how mj had longed
to be at
Mj
first fell under the spell of
Mj
drove so that they could relax and enjoy the scenery together
for once.
The
three shared motel rooms to economize and it embarrassed him,
he said, to shave in front of them. It was his first summer
shaving. He was seventeen.
They
went straight to
Mj
loved the area around
But
That
next school year, as an assignment for his freshman Creative
Writing course at Wrigley, mj wrote the poem about Opabin
Meadow which he mentioned ten years later while writing on
Hungabee. The lady professor, as Dr. Lorenzo told Sammy later,
chose to read no one’s poem to the class but his. She raved
about the ‘open vowel sounds’, an aspect of writing young mj
had never contemplated. He had responded to a deep feeling,
was all; and thought about technique hardly at all. He would
not see himself as a would-be writer until medical school.
Four
years later, in 1964, after graduating again, but from Wrigley
College this time, mj finally managed to get back to the spot
he had dreamt of seeing again for all four of those years:
Lake O’Hara.
He
spent the first part of the summer of ’64 selling dictionaries
in the D.C. area with a friend from Wrigley, Bob Ruegg. Rev
lent him his ’60 blue Buick Electra, making do with Jo’s older
maroon Pontiac so mj and Bob could get around in D.C. They
sold reasonably priced one-volume encyclopedic dictionaries
door-to-door to poor families of high school students in
suburbs of D.C. where only Blacks lived. They were doing well,
as he told Sammy years later, and making money. And one Friday
evening in Alexandria or Arlington, a group of Black drinking
teens menaced mj with a German shepherd and he got away unhurt
except for scrapes and bruises.
It was
late in the summer and he had just received his letter of
acceptance to medical school. Something snapped and he wanted
to get a break and go west. Bob was for it so they went to
Bob’s parents’ big house in suburban
They
went straight to
Bob
was excellent company. He was flexible, resourceful, together
and quiet, but now and then would let off a voluminous
unexpected hoot, just to get rid of some unspecified pent up
neo-Calvinist tension.
But on
the way back east, outside of
Mj had
been forced to call Rev and inform him that his beautiful car
was wrecked. But the kicker was (and mj loved telling this
part more than any other) that Rev should have scolded him but
‘never said one word
of complaint’. No condemnation for hauling his car across
country without asking to do so, or for wrecking it, either
one. Never. Because, maybe, he really was a good and loving,
caring father, his strict fundamentalism notwithstanding. And
maybe too because mj had been an exemplary son up to that
point, the summer he graduated from Wrigley, ’64, and Rev and
Jo had no complaints. Not yet. Complaints would come later. In
‘64 they had just attended their son’s magna cum laude
graduation at Wrigley and were very, very proud of him. They
were relieved he was alive and unhurt, and Bob too. So, with
the money Rev wired, mj and Bob took a bus to
And
with insurance money Rev bought a second – ‘barely used’ –
1960 blue Buick Electra identical to the first from a rich
elderly widow in Moorestown or Haddonfield who had never
driven it and was easily talked into lowering the price to
match the insurance company offer, in order to help a poor
Methodist preacher accomplish his mission for Christ here on
earth.1
On a
separate occasion in 2007 Dr. Lorenzo explained that several
years later, then, while driving toward Glacier in ’70, as
described at the beginning of The Remaking, he, or ‘young mj’,
as he liked to say, had thought about going up to Lake O’Hara
one more time immediately after Glacier Park. But of course he
had never made it because of ‘that crack-up’. THE
‘Crack-Up’, in other words.
That was why, he said; or: it was at
least one very important part of the reason why O’Hara had
become the final destination and climax of his year-long
Remaking trip to the
279. how a climb from
the lake to Hungabee was the right ending for a healing
Remaking trip and book
However,
the Dr. added: when it came to rounding out his nature-based
trip, book and healing, all three, and all with completeness
and balance, the
280. how such an ending
was thought by high schoolers ‘not dazzling enough’ and by
others ‘too dazzling to be true’ and how all felt the climax
of the Remaking should have been designed better to please
their taste
Dr.
Lorenzo later mentioned to Sammy that many pundits and high
school students had expressed bewilderment over the ‘
Rarely
could they say just what
they had expected. Many people had found it hard to express
anything about it at
all, in fact. Speechlessness
was not an uncommon response, the Dr. said. Bewilderment.
Amazement. Letdown.
American
movies, said a reviewer, ended when the tension was resolved
and the couple got married; and so, therefore, should American
books.
Some
high-schoolers who could
talk about it were especially flummoxed because they thought
that since mj’s first race up the flank of the Rockies to the
Divide had failed, this time he would win a harrowing,
dangerous Pikes Peak Hill Climb in a racecar, or win a
Vail-Mountain type of July-4th run-to-the-top
footrace, going full-speed straight up the nearly
perpendicular side of Hungabee and right off the top into pure
sky, his feet pedaling heavenward like a video game. Some of
the high-schoolers laughed right out loud in front of him
at mj’s idea of fun, the way he ran on the tops and sides of
alpine peaks ‘freezing his balls off’ naked.
Dr.
Lorenzo always enjoyed talking with high school students, he
said, because they helped him ‘get humble’ like his parents
did. He accepted invitations from high schools all over the
world, therefore, and in later years made it a pastime to keep
up with such invitations.
Unlike
high schoolers, however, some more settled and experienced
readers of books were surprised, instead, that The Remaking
ended so soon after spring Break-Up. It was not believable,
they objected, that things would go so well so suddenly after
years of nothing but psychic tempest, especially after the
last year, which had been tempest multiplied by tempest. It
‘lacked verisimilitude’, they charged. How in the world could
everything be suddenly so light and clear and pure, so elated
and optimistic? Was it realistic? No. It was too simple,
that’s what. Or naïve. Mj lorenzo, whoever he was, had to
be dreaming to think his life could get so darn lovely so
fast.
And
Dr. Lorenzo was perennially tickled and flabbergasted by all
such ‘psycho-woggle’ notions that pundits, high schoolers and
public came up with, year after year, when reacting to his
book and him. They wanted him, he said, to fictionalize his
life so it would seem ‘more real’. But that was okay, he said.
Because part of his ‘job in this world’ was to deal with
reactions to The Remaking, no matter how crazy they might seem
or be. The Remaking, he said, ‘like the Bible’, had become a
VEHICLE for discussion of ultimate truths, even during his
lifetime. And nothing could have gratified him more.
281. how the solstice
ordeal was seen by mainstream
pundits as an object lesson in Mortimer-Jack conflict
dynamics
Basic
pundit reaction, right from the early 70’s, to any and all
bewilderment from other readers over ‘Lake O’Hara’, was always
to pull out of their mental portfolios the tired cliché
that: the section
announced its subjects loudly on its very first page. No
one knew where the cliché had sprung up originally, but
all remembered it had been around and was available. So they
used it time and time again, especially with greenhorn college
students reading The Remaking for the first time.
‘Look
at the very first few keywords on the page’, they said to
perplexed parties year after year, generation after
generation: ‘high’; ‘Harlequin’s saucy sweetheart’; ‘Dlune’;
‘Peace Rose’; ‘Hungabee’; ‘Thunder Man’; ‘wait here for me’;
‘I want to do it myself’. What more was needed in order to
understand?
Mortimer’s
Triptique had foreseen that the climax of The Remaking would
have to deal with the matter of ‘ecstasy’, of ‘being high’.
This was ‘inevitable’. Mj had to establish that he was
‘remade’ sturdily enough now that he could allow himself to feel
truly happy day after day after day without having to
constantly fear he might spin out of control and become
‘manic’ as had occurred the year before (due to speed;
or to internal psychic imbalance; or both, most likely). For
that ‘mania’ had caused a ‘Crack-Up’ so grave it had killed
Delkrayle (or so he felt and said) and nearly killed him.
So:
the trick of ‘
Mortimer
had written several times over the winter on the subject of
what made the difference between mania or ‘sick joy’, and
ecstasy or true, ‘healthy joy’. Mania or ‘sick’ joy resulted
when the various strengths in Jack and Mortimer were not
properly power-managed, balanced and integrated.
Mania
resulted from the combination of (1) a long-suppressed and
suddenly released burst-out
of unchecked Freudian id,
i.e., primitive animal energy; and (2) a decaying, cracking
mask of dry, rigid intellect and bland acceptable
quasi-religious comeliness, through the cracks of which the id’s primitive animal
energy could/had burst, shattering the mask and leaving
essentially no lid or control on id; i.e. on ‘libido’, as Jung
more accurately and comprehensively named that energy burst.
The
newly burst-out and unfettered id or libido might team up
with a few of the crazy airy wisps of intellect that were
still floating in air after the explosive burst-out of
id/libido, and/or with some more deeply rooted animal
intuition, to produce a manic patient able to say non-stop and loudly the
most crazily brilliant apparent-nonsense one could imagine.
That was ‘mania’: Jack in the
Mania
was depression’s opposite, it was true, but its sick opposite. And
mj, approaching Hungabee and the solstice, was trying to design an
opposite to depression that would be not sick but
healthy; real unfettered happiness; real joy. His
term for this kind of real, genuine emotional high was
‘ecstasy’.
And mj
considered Dlune to be the key to finding this new kind of
elevated mood, not because he was in love only, but because
she made practical sense. She knew how to help him stay
balanced so he could enjoy happiness or ‘ecstasy’ with less
risk. ‘Dlune’, ‘Peace Rose’, and ‘Hungabee’ had all been
code-words for ecstasy since the Triptique. That was why he
put equals signs between them at the opening of ‘
Dlune’s
job from the beginning had been to encourage up-mood
manic-tending earthy Jack; and to keep down-mood
depressive-tending Mortimer enchanted and occupied with her
everyday earthiness. So that mj would not fly away into a
remote, dehumanized world of intellect, into that state of
mind which had defined and constituted mj lorenzo’s grave
imbalance for years prior to his Remaking year.
This
constant monitoring by Dlune always did elevate mj’s mood
eventually. And at this point in the trip and year, just as
planned and hoped, mj was succeeding in getting about as
‘high’ as he was capable of getting, mood-wise. And this
combination of circumstances put him at risk for exploding
into mania once again, i.e., for exploding into a state of too
much unfettered boiling id and libido,
combined with insufficient lid to control it.
So
theoretically, mj should
have, or might
have wanted Dlune at his side more than ever as
Lid-in-Reserve, to keep tabs on things and intervene, if
called for, to help modulate his mood and energy level while
up on airy, intoxicating Hungabee. But Dlune had quickly
gained an awful lot of power in mj’s life, as ‘
So:
whatever plot tension existed in ‘
The longer he stayed on the
mountain,
inspired by the high-altitude heavenly beauty of nature,
indulging his head-swelling dreams and visions, feeling above
everything and everybody down on the plains far below,
exposing and debilitating himself physically, and thus
mentally and emotionally too: the greater this final
Remaking challenge would be for him, and the greater the
accomplishment, therefore.
But:
climbing a high mountain produced a feeling of elation and
heightened power in almost anyone who did it, and could flip a
fragile mj over the edge. Dlune was a psych nurse and
understood that danger. She knew very well how far a
discombobulated mj lorenzo could go, how ‘very out there’ he
could get, having seen him in
And
so: when mj did not come back at the end of the second day, still, she decided to
go the third day, looking
for him, as was her custom and job, and as had been prescribed
by him: ‘In case you
have to come for me…’
Some
readers were confused by mj’s second version of their plan,
which he had written in his notebook while on Hungabee, and
had left for Dlune to read. In that version he agreed she
could bring him a sandwich on the third day; which was exactly
what she had done at that point; and yet, said most pundits,
that had not been their plan as the chapter had opened. The
best pundit explanation for this apparent discrepancy between
the two versions was that it was not a discrepancy. The going
theory became that mj had known from the beginning he would
stay on the mountain three days. It very well may have been
the original plan they had agreed to. But to calm her down he
had changed it and said he would be back in a day. For when
they had gotten to
And so
he was testing Dlune now, just as the mountain was testing
him. He apparently felt ready for the challenge of the quest.
He trusted himself. And in turn he wanted to see if he could
trust her. Did she believe in him enough to wait until the
third day, as they had originally agreed? She did wait, and
passed the test.
Many
high-schoolers, however, having once heard all this ridiculous
explanation, still
felt it was just a tempest in a teapot. They had lost patience
long ago with mj’s careful enterprise, apparently, mj’s
‘this-trip-for-one’, and ‘that-trip-for-two’. They were
frazzled and worn out by the calm of balance.
At the
same time, though, there was something about mj lorenzo’s The
Remaking which high school students could not dismiss or
forget. And no one was sure what it was, even though many
pundits tried to figure it out. They wrote treatises on how
H.S. students all over the world would invariably end up
referring to The Remaking during school lunch break almost
daily, quipping, “As mj
lorenzo says,… …peanut butter is good for you;” or, “As mj lorenzo says,…
Mr. Butler’s history assignment sucks the big one,” etc. etc.
II. The remainder
of the story on: the
culture hero pundits
282. how
Meanwhile,
the culture hero pundits had their own take on ‘
It was
easy to see how these hero-worshippers,
so-called by some (facetiously), had grown inordinately
successful interpreting The Remaking. The culture hero
pundits, unlike mainstream pundits, saw mj as a kind of Ghandi
or Christ writing an inspirational guidebook for future
followers bent on carrying out his ‘mission’. This was why
they inevitably looked at things no one else did. And since ‘
For
instance they said that mj had focused on Dlune more than on
himself at the end of his Remaking in order to ‘pass the
torch’, as it were, to his ‘disciples’. She was ‘his first
disciple’, the first devotee to help him with his mission. And
there would be more ‘disciples’ (if they had anything to say
about it). Her role was as personal and intimate as a
devotee’s could be, and that made her critical to his future
work in the world. But she was critical in a second way too,
as a first follower whose example would shine
to the guiding aid of those coming along behind her. And so,
mj had felt it necessary to represent her ‘carefully and with
purpose’, as they put it.
And,
emphasized the culture hero pundits as well, mj and Dlune were
seeking ‘a new place to live’, that is, somewhere to start
their new work and life, the Remaking mission. This explained
the newly married pair’s seemingly overdone and sophomoric
interest in ‘Loud Slap’. A lot of pundits thought it
‘inappropriate’ at first, so much affection for such a
simple-messaged, or simple-minded, childish or
early-adolescent Boy Scout tale as ‘Loud Slap’, which looked
to have been designed for young Blackfoot braves-in-training.
But –
said the ‘culture hero’ pundits – as naïve in tone as it
may have been, and uncomplicated in content, ‘Loud Slap’
addressed the critical, survival-related subject of finding
one’s place in the world, a place with enough food and water
and protection and comfort to support a long, pleasant and
productive life. That was a hugely important subject,
especially in a world ever more crowded with people competing
for resources every day. And once mj and Dlune had found their
new place to live, said the culture hero pundits, mj could
then proceed with his life’s work. His ‘mission’, as they
forever referred to it.
283. how their
interpretation of
These
extremist hero pundits could guess what mj must have needed
right after Hungabee, they told the world during the
seventies, after having studied him and his work for so many
years. The young couple would have needed a place where:
1. mj could work as a psychiatrist, for that was his vocation
and source of income; 2. their children could be raised with
access to all they deserved; 3. Dlune could feel at home,
since she had come from an extremely northern zone and was
Native American; and 4. mj could find peace and quiet and
write. And also, as these hero-pundits added: mj lorenzo would
almost certainly have needed a place where he could keep in
touch with his inevitable admirers and supporters and ‘especially with his most
important helpers on his mission’.
This
last point got them thinking about themselves again, actually.
And it became the thing that pushed the hero worshippers over
the edge in 79 finally and made them demand that Sammy contact
mj for them. And that failing, as the world would hear
eventually, they tracked him down themselves and found him in
A
conversation ensued between mj lorenzo and the culture hero
adherents at that time, right off the bat, first by mail, and
then in person. In the very first live meeting, culture hero
zealots began to pressure their hero to ‘take a stand’.
By way
of reply he asked them, “If Thomas Mann and James Joyce were
felt by their respective peoples, the Germans or Irish, to
have hit several nails on the head at once tapping into the
soul of the German and Irish people, respectively, would that
make Mann and Joyce ‘culture
heroes’?
“Or
wouldn’t it mean they were just doing their job as writers?”
he asked.
A
volunteer spokesman for the hero group tried to answer this.
He allowed there could be a distinct difference between a very
good writer who spoke for his people, on the one hand, and a
culture hero as defined by Joseph Campbell, on the other. But,
he added, Mann and Joyce had not offered as many suggestions
for improving the culture as mj had. For The Remaking had
actually prescribed
a very clear and detailed treatment plan and then carried
it out. The Remaking had left behind a useful
outline of how the
process of ‘healing’ might be applied TO ANY ENTITY in
conflict with itself. Not just to individuals, but
to groups too. To countries; to whole races; and even to huge
geopolitical power blocs. And maybe even to nature itself.
284. how mj said “If
I’m a culture hero it’s news to me” and how the culture hero
pundits then tried to see mj lorenzo as an antihero and
failed
Dr.
Lorenzo appeared taken aback. He admitted he had tried to do
just that, to come up with a conceptual framework that might
succeed in elucidating not just his own craziness, but
humanity’s craziness as well, and one that could ‘treat’ both.
But
Carl Jung had done something ‘far better’, he said, after
thinking a few seconds. And while Jung had won many adherents,
many of them terrifically brilliant and exemplary in every
way, he doubted Jung had ever been called a culture hero.
Maybe he should have been, he conceded. And Jung may have seen
himself as one privately, because he structured his work like
a man with a mission. But his system was highly intellectual.
And most of his books were tough work for even the brightest,
most educated readers.
And
Jung’s followers were middle and upper class professionals,
all very comfy in their little world of psychoanalysis, and
each so brilliant and artistically and emotionally sensitive
that they all spent half of their mental and emotional energy
lifelong just trying to stay sane living typical everyday
lives in the materialistic, super-compartmentalized, forever
increasingly dehumanized and dehumanizing Western world. And
those who did teach and write, trying to pass on the
experience of growth that Jung had helped them have, wrote
almost as intellectually as he had written. Not one brilliant
follower ever succeeded in popularizing Jung’s
teaching except Clarissa Pinkola-Estes to a small extent. So,
popularizing Jung was something that someone else still might
try, said Dr. Lorenzo, maybe even someone in the auditorium
that day. Because Jung’s system was potentially curative for
the world. But to his knowledge, again, since Jung had reached
only a small group of people, no one had ever called Jung a
‘culture hero’.
The
Dr. had come pretty close to saying that himself, one pundit
pointed out, standing to speak, when Mortimer, in the 'second
attempt' of The Remaking,
had called Jung ‘the shaman for the global village’, the
‘global shaman’. And furthermore, said this pundit, quite
politely, of course: though Jung had addressed political and
international problems in terms of his psychotherapeutic
conceptual system at times, he and his followers had stressed
individual healing far more. Whereas Dr. Lorenzo in The
Remaking appeared to have stressed a global approach to a
far greater extent than had Jung. And in addition, the role of
Dlune in The Remaking was meant to symbolize his future
devotees and helpers in the world, so that he could fulfill
his mission to the whole world, the mission he had always felt
was his, to ‘save the human race from annihilating itself’.
Wasn’t that true?
Dr.
Lorenzo again appeared taken aback. He was right in the middle
of a very uncomfortable divorce with Dlune and had just lost
contact with his kids, so he was sad and shaken up. For years
he had barely thought about The Remaking. He had merely
struggled to survive emotionally and economically in the
world, and had not expected probing questions aimed at the
core of his super-sensitive psyche when he had accepted the
invitation to meet with readers. So he said those things to
them, every detail, and more. He said he had simply been
living a quiet life. He described that life, and he wrapped up
by saying that if he were a ‘culture hero’, it was ‘news to
him’.
And
anyway, he added, “The Western world already has too many
heroes, and always has had.”
Well.
News of this ball-buster spread like greased lightning. The
culture hero people were devastated. They felt abandoned by
their hero and immediately within the pundit circle a new
school of thought crashed into being for the sole purpose of
counter-butting the culture hero school. It was known as the
‘culture antihero’ school of thought, or the ‘antihero’ school.2
And other new schools of thought popped up, some in reaction
to this one, others for crazier reasons. The political
structure of the pundit world transformed overnight.
Dr. Lorenzo was invited back
after a few months of pundit reconnoitering. And he accepted
the invitation, again without realizing where it might lead.
In the
fall of 1980 they flew him to
Mj
lorenzo, he said, as he looked at the Dr. and at the audience
too, from time to time, had in effect declared himself an antihero when he had
said that there always had been too many conquering hero-types
in the Western world, and that this always had been one of the
Western world’s chief problems vis-à-vis the world
outside, and that he, mj lorenzo, did not want to be one of those
conquering heroes, or be in any way like any of them. But
the fact remained, said this spokesman for the ‘antihero’
group, that mj lorenzo still wanted to ‘save humanity from
destroying itself’, as his Remaking had proclaimed. His
approach was simply opposite that of all the heroic figures
and groups that had hitherto characterized the Western world.
Instead of proclaiming a mission to better the world, then
going and trying to ram that ‘better’ down everyone’s throats,
as various factions in the Western world had done for
centuries in so many forms, even Jung himself, maybe; instead
of that, mj lorenzo was proclaiming a mission, then proceeding
to quietly demonstrate
his mission by pure example, and little else, not even
looking over his shoulder to see if anyone might notice.
He was not seeking followers. Yet followers were seeking him.
He had quietly and painfully studied himself and remade
himself to correct errors set in motion back when the Western
world had come into being. He had written down the formula for
accomplishing this remaking so that other individuals and even
whole nations and nation blocs might try remaking themselves.
He had married an Indian woman, producing children of mixed
race. He had worked helping people emotionally damaged by the
off-kilter way in which the Western world had lived for two
thousand years. And then, the book he had written – containing
the formula for remaking – he had left in a box in a closet
with dirty socks on top of it, never knowing for ten years his
father had published the book. And now he was willing to go
out of his way to answer questions from readers.
And
who in the world could guess what Dr. Lorenzo might do next, or not do, said the
‘antihero’ pundit. Mj lorenzo might act like an antihero
at the moment, and talk
like one and even feel
to himself like an antihero maybe. But to them, he would
always be a real hero
because of his overall admirable example.
The
pundits applauded with uproar and Dr. Lorenzo seized the noise
as a good moment to rise and disappear into the wings. And
afterward he was not a little bowled over for several whole
months.
And
so: the attempt by ‘culture hero’ pundits’ to see mj lorenzo
as ‘antihero’ failed in no time. Miserably. They were ‘culture
hero’ pundits again, each and all. And they remained so, to
the point that an awkward tension between them and the Dr.
continued for years. His ‘Laugh and a Half’ conferences of
’95-’97 were aimed chiefly at them and the Sunday Schoolers,
in fact.3
285. how freshman
pundits tried to get to the bottom of the tension between mj
lorenzo and the culture hero pundits
And
newcomers to punditry wanted to get to the bottom of all this
discomfort. Mainstreamers had thrown up their hands after a
year of trying to do that in the early seventies. But
newcomers after 1980 took the whole world of punditry on,
saying that if the culture hero people thought mj to be an
‘avatar’, they should just call him on the phone and ask, “Are
you an avatar?”
But
the culture hero people could not bring themselves to do this.
Maybe because a Today Show host had asked the Dr. the question
once right on early morning live TV, and he had said,
grinning, “Ask the pundits!”
But
the pundits did not know for certain. Because they could not
bring themselves to ask. ‘Something about the man made it
impossible’, they said. Nobody could explain the strange
catatonia of will on the part of the same people who once had
been so hyperactive as to dig mj lorenzo out of bed with
Dlune. Not even their joke-master critics, the mainstreamers,
could explain this strange phenomenon.
But it
comforted the latter tremendously to see their ‘culture hero’
associates humbled for once, to see that the ultimate
super-saintly do-gooders could be found helpless after all,
in at least one tiny corner of their ‘crazy devotional souls’.
Hero worshippers could allow ‘room for mystery’ in their
‘hallowed universe’ after all, howled mainstreamers at wine
and cheese parties to which they were certain no spies had
gained entry who would divulge to culture hero nuts or the
prying press this dark side of mainstream pundit politics.
Yet;
and but: even mainstreamers had to admit the following
morning all hung over that even perfect they
felt helpless when it came to asking Dr. Lorenzo that
ballsy question. Maybe because he had never brought it
up himself. Who knew why? Maybe they were afraid he would say,
“No, I am not an avatar. I am not a savior. I am not Jesus
Christ returned. I am not a reincarnation of Vishnu. I am just
a regular guy like you and you and you.”
For
that was something that comforted many: he had never said he
was ‘NOT any of those things’. He had said, precisely, “If I’m
a culture hero, then it’s news to me.” But few pundits had
taken this to mean absolutely, ‘No, I am not a culture hero’.
Many thought he was playing hide-and-seek, just as
So
most pundits, eventually, came to understand he had said it as
part of a campaign to re-shape their nervous systems in a way
that would help them stop thinking like typical
Western-world-ers; i.e., stop thinking that their own
group was the
only one that could ever discern how life should be lived on
the planet or ever produce great wisdom, sages, avatars and
saviors. Stop them, in other words, from thinking so
heroically, so naively and obsessively, like a pack of
blindly, impulsively and violently idealistic teenage samurai
turtles.
But –
fortunately – the newcomers – probably sensing the
self-muzzled dark side of the mainstreamers – could never let
it rest. Had mj lorenzo not said in his Remaking that he
thought he knew better than others did how life should be
lived, and that he had come into the world to save it?
YES,
they all answered the newcomers loudly: ‘from blowing itself up!’
That was what he had said. To save their bodily lives,
the physical life of the human race, not to ‘save’ their
‘spirit’ or ‘soul’ like Jesus. Not to ‘enlighten’ them like
Buddha. Just to preserve them physically from
self-destruction, so they could still have a ‘spirit’ to
‘enlighten’, whatever that might mean to a given person.
286. how the Remaking
pundit old-timers laid out for newcomer pundits exactly in
what way their lives had been remade
BUT, said the newcomers again and again,
meaning the constantly arriving newcomers who comprised one
brand new generation of punditry after another: “You
‘old-timer’ Remaking experts keep saying that mj lorenzo ‘changed
your life immeasurably for the better’. The
Remaking ‘remade
you’, as you grew to understand and apply its
principles.”
And
this, the ‘old-timers’ could never deny, fortunately. They
were left briefly speechless by each such challenge because
each time it came up they were reminded of the thing which
kept arguing for the shockingly un-swallowable possibility
that mj lorenzo might be an ‘avatar’ or ‘culture hero’ or
‘savior’ on the level of Buddha, Christ or Krishna after
all. A ‘savior’ not just of the human race in body, but
of the ‘soul’ of the race, if one meant the word ‘soul’, at
the very least, in the way Afro-Americans meant it when they
talked about having ‘soul’. For it was true: he had indeed
‘saved their heart of
hearts’. He had ‘made them human again’.
That was
the word: ‘human’, as ‘early Remaking pundits’ explained to
freshman newcomers. It was not human enough to
block D.C. intersections, as they had done, until suppressed
groups got a piece of the pie; or until our boys were brought
home from war; or until politicians who were put in office by
organized blocs of extremist neo-Calvinists stopped treating
gays and ‘les-/bi-/trannies’ as abominable anathema condemned
by God. To be human
you had to know people on both sides of a struggle intimately.
To not lose your humanity you had to know the insides
of the people you were fighting for, meaning the insides of
the ‘Blacks’; and the fighting ‘boys’; the ‘gays’; women,
poor, or whoever. Everybody.
And
trickier yet, you
had to know your enemy intimately, those who
were doing the suppressing, the ones who were sending the
suppressed to perdition.
And vice
versa, if you were an extremist on the ‘right’, the ‘Mortimer’
side of a conflict, the same applied in reverse. You had to
get to know the people you called anathema intimately. Fall in
love with a leftist, if necessary. Share their bodies and
homes with them. ON THEIR TURF; not your turf. And you had to
let that knowledge of humanity change you. Then you started
to become ‘human’.
And if and
when you were human to that extent – (and if and when enough
others had done as much, and assuming they had not destroyed
your planet and you
with it yet, before you could ask the next
question) – then and
only then could you ask -- if you still did not
know -- what the purpose of your life on the planet, after that, might be.
First
things first. Get and be human as you
were born to be. That was purpose number one on the planet. Then
ask the very biggest questions, if you wanted to ‘think like
God’ as Mortimer had wanted to think. For: a dog’s first job
on the planet was to be a dog, not a Homo sapiens. And a man’s
first job was to be a man, not God, or a god.
Because: if you asked grave questions before you were fully
human, ‘fully a man’ or ‘a mature woman’, then the upshot of
asking was likely to turn aberrant, as aberrant as the
upshot of asking the very rational, scientific questions that
had produced the very rational and scientific and seemingly
benign Theory of Relativity. The results of asking such
rational and scientific questions, unfortunately, were just as
likely to be aberrant and anti-human, unfortunately,
as had been E=mc² and the very rational and scientific
atom bomb. Needles to
say.
Just
imagine, said experienced pundits when explaining this to
newcomers, what might have happened if mj lorenzo ‘as Mortimer’
had tried during Freeze-Up to come up with a theology as
comprehensive, coherent and consistent as that of Thomas
Aquinas. (Mortimer was capable of it, they reminded.) So he
could understand to the nth rational degree ‘how the
Holy Spirit had gotten the virgin Mary pregnant with
Godsperm’. ‘Mortimer’
had not been ‘human
enough’ yet to have produced anything but ‘more
damage’ to the world, had he pried into
‘that corner of God’s mind’, the pundits said. Whereas, when
the question had enticed mj in later life; now; recently;
‘fully human as he was now’: he’d had the good sense to guzzle
three beers and get a good night’s snooze and forget about it.
287. how freshman
pundits felt silenced
Well, darn.
The newcomers heard in these comments an invitation to shut
up. They were ‘trying too hard to theologize’, apparently.
They were ‘wet behind the ears’, according to old-timers. They
were trigger-happy and should hold their fire. And even more
insulting, they were ‘not human enough yet’ to ask
such ‘dangerous’ questions without ‘rocking the boat’ of the
pundit world. And they were filled with chagrin, generation
after generation of newcomers. Yet, for some fortunate
reason, they cow-towed; amazingly; and let their
super-provocative question lie, about who and what exactly mj
lorenzo might be, culture hero or what. Maybe out of respect
for mj and his chief spokesmen; or maybe because they saw the
wisdom in mj lorenzo’s identifying this problem: of asking
graver questions than one was capable of answering or
understanding. Even though they were perfect rabble-rousers in
their own right, just as their predecessors had been, and
could have raised a big stink in the press or anywhere about
this muzzling of their admirable intelligence.
They had
merely wanted to get to the bottom of all the tension they had
uncovered in a world of punditry which, if truly in possession
of ‘the truth’, as that world claimed to be, should have been
at peace with itself by now, as they felt. That was all.
Nothing so earthshaking as to have to be shut up for asking.
But they had been asked to ‘wait’, and so they would wait.
Maybe things would
work out without their impatient help.
288. how culture hero
pundits formed an organization named El Wammy because
they worried that not enough was being done to help their
hero’s mission
And the
culture hero pundits, meanwhile, supported such answers to
newcomers from mainstreamers. They did not want to be badgered
either. Culture hero people had always understood the very
core of their hero’s message, even if they had gone too far
with hero-worshipping at times. They were simply worried about
mj’s mission, they explained. That was all. Everybody should
be as worried about his mission as they were, they thought.
And so, by
2005 they had formed an organization named ‘El Wammy’, derived
from the words ‘live with a Mexican in her/his home:’ ‘LWAMIHHH’.
During the
late nineties they had supported Dr. Lorenzo’s proposal that
But elected
school board members across the
And so when
Dr. Lorenzo moved to
And it
worked.
All he
asked of them was that they keep a distance in
And they
followed his recommendation and wrote books about their years
in
And this,
then, was when Dr. Lorenzo ‘finally’ began to give the
‘culture hero’ people some ‘long overdue and much deserved’
attention, as they told New York Times editors. He
complimented them on their work in person and in the papers.
And he supported it. In fact, he announced that what ‘deserved
special attention’ in their schema was the decision to stop
trying to change school boards and the rest of the world, and
to start trying to change themselves instead.
For he
could see that many of them, when they came home from Mexico
after 2002 or so, seemed humbler and more ‘natural’ and
‘human’, as others had seen too and marveled upon in the
press.
And by 2003
this first core group of Mexican adventurers had come up with
an even more exciting definition and mission for ‘El Wammy’.
The ‘M’ in LWAMIHHH now stood for ‘Muslim’, they said. The way
to get along with Muslims in the world was not to have them
come live in the
But: even
if they did come to the states and no civil-war Balkan- or
Spanish-type struggle ensued, it would never be enough.
White Americans had already tried that with Black Africans.
Blacks had lived in white homes as slaves and servants. And
later, Mexicans had replaced them. All of which was a start,
again, granted. But it could never be ‘enough’ to make both
sides human again. It could never ‘save humanity from
self-annihilation’, as mj lorenzo said was possible and
essential.
What had
saved Mortimer, according to culture hero people, was when, on
Dlune’s recommendation, he had asked Chipewyan – ‘without fear
because he was desperate’ – if the old man would help him
find a place for the winter. And what had ‘saved his skin far
more’ was accepting Chipewyan’s invitation to live with
him.
Americans
then, similarly, would have to go to the countries of Muslims
and live right in their little homes and tents, because
humanity was desperate for solutions now.
And the
mainstreamers, for once, supported these crazy ‘culture hero’
fanatics. It was not enough any more, they agreed, to block
traffic or stage protests or preach to school boards. With the
destruction of the twin towers on 9/11 in 2001, the only thing
left, they said (when everyone else was ‘decked out in war
regalia’), was to ‘set a different kind of tone and example’
and live with people you thought were anathema ON THEIR TURF
and in their decrepit home-hovels, trying to see things
through their eyes a little, and publicizing the results for
the edification of all.
The rest of
punditry for once supported ‘one of the craziest harebrained
notions the hero worshippers had ever dreamt up’, as they told
The Observer. They
admitted the plan’s wisdom. Which was that in order to be
fully human in the way mj was challenging them to be, it was
not enough to have ‘your enemy’ or ‘potential nemesis’ ‘in YOUR house’,
as they put it, your own American home. Black slave nannies
had lived in white southerners’ homes with them, nursing and
raising their children, forming liaisons with the white
daddies and making mixed-race children. And none of it had
stopped whites from suppressing Blacks. Because that experience
had occurred ‘on suppresser turf’.
When hero
pundits went to Mexico, on the other hand, they lived ‘with
the other side’ ‘on their
turf’, sharing their germs, falling in love with them,
enjoying sexual relationships with them ON THEIR TURF, getting
to know them intimately on their terms and territory,
and suffering culture shock in Mexico just as everyone else in
the world did when they came to the states.
And it was
one of the very few things in a period of many decades that
had actually rendered those cocky, weirdo-extremist culture
hero pundits a little bit humble and tractable. Even
reading and knowing The Remaking inside and out had never
given them that humility or true wisdom, they confessed,
shocking everyone with the confession. Not even being shot
down mercilessly by the
And they
were shocked. They could not understand what had happened and
they asked Dr. Lorenzo for an explanation. Why did they feel,
as they put it during a 2004 Naropa writers’ workshop in
Boulder, ‘so damn good for the first time in our lives, as if
somebody had saved our souls or something’.
And the Dr.
answered them, “Once the Jack part of you feels truly
embraced, the rest of you goes along for the ride.”
So: as the
‘culture hero’ pundits said, the time had come to ‘change the
M word to Muslim’.
289. how Dr. Lorenzo
recognized the accomplishments of the culture hero crew
And for the
culture hero pundits’ brilliant work toward peace and human
understanding Dr. Lorenzo raised punditry awards to a new
level. At the 2004 awards banquet in
III. The remainder
of the story on: mj
lorenzo (as of the present writing)
290. how pundits saw mj
lorenzo’s impact on the human enterprise as of 2007
In short,
by 2007 it had become a cliché among mainstream pundits
to sum up the argument in a few more sentences. Whatever you
might call mj lorenzo, whether crazy or culture hero, avatar
or con or Coyote trickster (as many thought), the fact
remained that: the
trick had worked. By 2007 his writing and life,
i.e., his 1971 The Remaking and the way he had lived
since then, including his very quiet
year-in-year-out effort to make the world a better place, had
helped many people around the globe grow more healthily and
naturally human, people on all sides of every equation.
In other
words, as the ‘git-along’ pundits had said for years: you
could argue about everything else, including whether mj
lorenzo’s The Remaking were Holy Holy or wholly holey,
but no one could deny that it had made the world more happily
human. He had given people hope. And not just pie-in-the-sky
hope, but a way, a practical formula based
on the ‘crazy Remaking year of M and J’.
Despite his
apparent craziness at times mj lorenzo had, as almost all
pundits agreed, provided the world with a concrete blueprint
for healing the pain caused by extreme differences of belief,
for correcting imbalances of power, and gently, step-by-step,
for depolarizing some of the many frighteningly hyperpolarized
situations to be found around the globe. And in fact, the
world had already applied those principles in a variety of
situations and benefited.
Evidence
even existed that ‘God’s
nature itself’, to use Dr. Lorenzo’s term, had benefited
from mj lorenzo and his crazy ‘experimental sacred handbook
for psychotics’, since even the earth’s solar system had shown
better electromagnetic tune and balance starting around May or
June of 1971, as certain Remaking unified theory pundits
claimed who had carefully monitored and measured such matters.
Human
civilization had not nuked itself to obliteration yet, they
said. So who could prove them wrong?
1 Mj
lorenzo’s most determined enemies enjoyed a brief heyday when
this revelation first came to their attention around 2006. The
entire Remaking was
obviously a single big whopping falsehood from start to finish,
they said. A stunt. A trick. After mj told this story they
didn’t believe anything,
not even that there had been a blue Buick crack-up in ’64,
or a blue Buick crack-up in ’70. No trip any time. No Crack-Up.
No Remaking. No anything. MJ LORENZO WAS A FAKE. And the
‘fiction’ pundits triumphed too, while mainstream punditry was
not fazed, because they had allowed forever that like almost any
story in the history of humanity, mj’s tale was very likely
‘part real, part imagined, part exaggerated and part
inaccurately remembered’. They just had never been able to
descry which part was which, and they still did not know. So
this must have been what their mj had wanted, apparently; and
this was how it was going to be. And they accepted it. But a few
of them cried inside (they admitted a few years later) because,
as they felt, mj’s idea of a second cracking up of a
replacement Buick in
1970 did not get across the idea of poor beautiful mj’s
‘profoundly tragic Crack-Up’ the way his idea of once and
forever totaling Rev’s original
blue Buick Electra had moved everybody. One forgiving group
believed mj in his old age was regretting having beaten up on
Rev for so many decades, and wanted the world to remember that
Rev had had a
wonderful fatherly side to him, too, and so mj had fleshed out
the ‘real story’ for that reason. While yet another stalwart
school of thought held that the original story was ‘true’ and
that this last story was the one that was made up, just to ‘keep
Remaking pundits on their toes’, remembering always that
physical location and condition were not the central point, but
what was going on in heart and mind.
2 An
‘antihero’ is, as Merriam-Webster’s
Unabridged Dictionary defines it (computer Version 3.0,
2003), ‘a protagonist who is notably lacking in heroic
qualities’.
3 See the
next chapter: ‘the rightful prologue: the laugh and a half
conferences’.