…for him ever to look at again;
fix; talk about in public; or deal with period. He had not
planned it or seen it coming in October of ’70 certainly,
but so it had turned out.
And
the impossible ‘bugger’ had even demanded to be left alone and just
as it was: ‘with
silent clamor’, the Dr. added, like ‘a miserable
puppy refusing a bath’, but ‘too precociously wise at its
fledgling age to whine like any other puppy’. It just
looked at you with ‘those big baby eagle eyes’, and that
must have been why Jack had never been able to look at the
thing even as much as one more time
before mailing it off to his parents un-cleaned up, and
why, once known to everyone in the street, it had always
felt to him like the most ‘tyrannically aloof’ member of
his Remaking ‘off-(al)-spring’ pack.
Yet
all this did not mean that it was okay to forget that
miserable monster of a bird-puppy called the
63. the sad and
legendary
Most
of
But
gradually, as communication among readership increased
during the early 70s, some understanding grew as to why
One
of the very first informal Remaking study groups ever
formed, not surprisingly, therefore, was a co-ed mix of
Penn undergrads and sundry older pundit friends who met in
the second storey lounge of the women’s dorm at 34th
and Walnut in the fall of ’73, with the sole purpose of listing as many
‘credible and appropriate’ reasons as they could find,
as to why Fort Resolution made everyone so mysteriously
morose.
Reasons
like ‘My Aunt Harriet died forty five years ago in
But
they bit the bullet and met and came up with a short list
of reasons why, probably, the chapter made people sad,
when everyone suddenly got so oppressed with grief the
meeting broke up morosely and never reconvened in the
history of humanity to date. Known history,
anyway.
'Hovering
over
And
when they all heard the words ‘end of freedom’ and saw it
was true, having read The Remaking, each one at least
several times; and when they took note that they had never
even thought of it
until then; and when they wrote it down on the list, and
saw it lined up with the first seven losses; and when it
registered how many other
‘reasons’ must have been overlooked until now, maybe all
as whopping as ‘the end of freedom’, they just simply
quit. Got up and walked out.
Probably
ninety more huge
tragic losses like ‘the end of freedom’ could have been
found, they realized afterward, like ‘the end of delicious
insanity’, or ‘the end of getting along just fine without
Mortimer’, ‘the end of naïve and delighted
discovery’, ‘the end of poetry’, ‘the end of
everything human’, etc. But who cared? ‘The end of
magic’; ‘the end of healing’; ‘the end of magical
healing’: none of it mattered. ‘The end of freedom’ was
the last straw.
It
was far too much for anyone to lose, way too sad to
discuss and pointless to dwell on, everything being so
obvious. And they went home bummed out for several weeks
just thinking about the implications,
which were a damn bummer.
The implications of
Jack,
these early pundits said, had been the first one to
discover, intuitively, and in such a beautifully
brilliant, even playful, animal-instinct way, the
wonderful but tragic paradigm of the way he and Mortimer
had always interacted in the past. That discovery had been
a gift to mankind. And
now it was going to happen again, they complained.
Mortimer was going to put walls around Jack and choke the
life out of him one
more time. Was this not true? Had Mortimer not
always done as much up until now? Why should it be
different this time? No one wanted to think about it.
It made everyone
mad over the years. Everyone.
Even
the few perennially obstreperous Mortimer-lovers, those
‘reactionary’ Remaking pundit cliques, those tiny cells
which came to be famous eventually like the ones in
After
all, hadn’t every reader in the world enjoyed a beautiful
summer with Jack? The Lorenzos had hardly cherished the
fun, of course. Least of all poor Rev. But everyone else
in creation had, even Jo at times. And now Jack had to
give way to Mortimer, one more darn time,
as the early Remaking pundits would moan to each other.
64. sad
The
Fortunately
a certain value was placed on this crucial turning point
in The Remaking by those first few serious students.
Anyone who could not intelligently and calmly address ‘
Dr.
Lorenzo in time thanked the early pundits for all these
ground rules, and confessed they had done him and the
world a favor. For he had been in no position to govern
his readership, nor would he have wanted to be, of course.
He could barely govern himself, let alone them, he said
with a smile the very first time he met a few of his
followers at the
65. the ‘true but
sad’ meaning of
This
stunning discovery of the true meaning of
So
he thanked his faithful pundits for having helped him
finally understand better the mystery of his own
underground blockbuster.
And
rightly so, said the critical press; for after all, Dr.
Lorenzo’s not having had a thorough understanding of Fort
Resolution had helped contribute to the world-famous
insecurity he had always hated so, that famous self-doubt
that would hit him again and again, all his life,
inexplicably, that awful feeling that perhaps he did not
or could not or would not ‘remember’ ‘correctly’ why he had
written the darn book. In fact, as of 2005, he still felt he
might have missed something: as if further mysterious
inchoate answers might still be lurking deep within
66. yet the ‘true
meaning’ could not be found on the page
The
heavy importance of the section amazed its author and his
irrepressible pundit coterie for yet another reason: that it had never
existed on the page.
But
this they came to understand as simply another example of
how The Remaking operated in its original
form; how that crazy-quilt patchwork hit you; how mj’s
sketchy, understated, mandalic word collage
left so many open spaces for the reader to fill in. The
THIS IS THE LAST TIME IN THE
LIFE OF MJ LORENZO THAT THE WORLD, INCLUDING POOR MJ
HIMSELF, WILL EVER GET TO SEE THE SIDE OF HIM WE HAVE
ALL COME TO LOVE AND KNOW AS PURE UNMITIGATED ‘JACK’,
WITH ALL HIS WILD, PRIMITIVE, WINSOME CRAZINESS AND
GUTSY, INSTINCTUAL CHARM, AND ALL OF IT WITHOUT THE
SLIGHTEST COMPROMISING SUBSERVIENCE TO BORING WESTERN
HIGHER THOUGHT OR RELIGION.
JACK, AFTER 27 YEARS OF BEING
SUPPRESSED TOTALLY, HAS MANAGED TO WIN FOR HIMSELF AND
ENJOY TO THE HILT EXACTLY FOUR MONTHS OF
UNTRAMMELED SELF-EXPRESSION. AND HE DOES LEAVE BEHIND
HIM ‘OFFAL-SPRING’, GRANTED. BUT NOW HE MUST SUCCUMB.
JACK WILL RETURN AGAIN, BUT
ONLY IN ALTERED FORM AS PART OF THE NEW MJ LORENZO AFTER
SPRING BREAK-UP. AND HE WILL HAVE MORE SAY THAN IN THE
OLD MJ. BUT TRAGICALLY HE WILL NEVER AGAIN HAVE ANYTHING
NEAR THE ABSOLUTE FREEDOM
OF EXPRESSION HE HAS ENJOYED THIS SUMMER.
There
was no explanation
or warning of this kind anywhere in mj’s original
Remaking, observed the early pundits. Not a word. Yet it
was true. But the fact might be recognized only after a
reader attained thorough knowledge of the work. Reading it
the first time you might
sense a tragedy brewing in the wings at
This
explained why when you came to Fort Resolution and began
reading it for the very first time you were half-fooled
into thinking you were reading the same old kinds of
things as in Jack’s preceding missives to his parents:
neurotic excerpts from Mortimer’s notebooks; poetic
reactions from Jack; corny quotes from Band Programs;
gutsy theology from Jack; etc. But at some point while
reading
And
what reader ever wanted Mortimer to take over The Remaking and
dominate mj lorenzo? Readers of the original Remaking,
traumatized by having waded neck-deep through several
endless, soul-suffocating bogs of quotes from Mortimer’s
notebooks, all came away suffering little affection or
sympathy for the one who had created them. Mortimer was not
lovable because he was not human and not animal, either
one. He was depressed; neurotic; overly
intellectual; and tiresomely rule-obsessed. That was
the fact, sadly.
All of the rich, lovable
animal-mammalian humanity in mj lorenzo lay on Jack’s
side of the mj equation. This meant that Resolution was
also the end of love; the end of true
humanity within and between humans; the end of
canine pet company. The pall that dropped was a
terrifying one, even if and when you had come to
comprehend that Jack would be back in the spring. Because:
true, he would
be back, in a new form; BUT:
would we really love Jack in his new form as much as we
had loved that rambunctious puck in Part I?
Thus
the real message
of
Or
they said it was like delighting in Tom and Huck and their
whimsy and suddenly, after a few chapters of dionysian
cat-poisoning romp, having to attend their joint funeral,
not a mock one but a real one, weeping
and wailing, and having to actually bury those two
immortal boys in coffins, with sprinkling of dirt and all,
right down to throwing carnations and then, as one clever
group of early pundits put it, having to ‘still keep reading
another twice-as-many chapters about the boring mental
machinations of the depressed freaking preacher that had
just killed and buried Tom and Huck, who was named Dr.
Mortimer Scrooge’. You would laugh at Dr. Scrooge
any chance you got, they said, but you would much rather
laugh your life away at Tom and Huck. And so, from the
second reading on and ever thereafter, the last chapter of
romp before the funeral would always be, as the pundits
put it, ‘a super drag to read’ for all those experienced
readers who knew in advance what was left unstated: that,
namely, ‘all of
this wonderful whimsy would soon give way to pallor’.
67. hints of the
pallor to come
On
the other hand, some pundits felt that a certain few
paragraphs in the envelope might be said to give tiny
hints – maybe – as to the imminent loss that Jack was
feeling and trying to hide, heroically. Jack never
discussed the matter openly any more that John Wayne would
have, so no one could know exactly how much he might have
foreseen, therefore. But it could be argued that he appeared to have
at least intuited
or sixth-sensed looming disintegration or
subjection, judging from a certain few paragraphs, those
for example where he reacted further to the self-effacing,
super-Christian hype on Mortimer’s Band Program from
Wrigley:
In Band we seek to
rediscover the unity which comes from the knowledge that
Christ, not our own self, lives within us, that our music
is for His glory, not ours.
No nobis
Dominum,3 the expression
St. Paul used, Rev, meaning ‘Christ (Mortimer) is a
sword and a shield to guard me’ (guard Jack; mj), or
rather, more extremely, that Christ (Mortimer) replaces and
fills me (Jack; mj) literally, living within
me (Jack; mj): such a
self-effacing approach to life may be the
very notion that originates my (Jack’s; mj’s) frantic
duality and search for myself (my real Jack and mj).
If I (mj
lorenzo) do not live within myself (mj), then who
does? (If I [mj] do not live within
myself [mj], then where do I [mj]?) If I
(mj) am not writing these lines, then who is?
If I (mj) can blame “Christ” for my goodness, then I
(mj) can accuse the devil or the communists or
Democrats of causing my (mj’s) mistakes. If I (mj) do
not live my own life at Wrigley, then Wrigley
(Mortimer) lives it for me, and later, perhaps, in a
shock of discovery (how?) of who I (mj) truly, truly
am, truly:
I (mj)
explode like a nuclear warhead.
Now in my
curious lack of definition I (mj as Jack) must collect
the pieces of this self (Mortimer) from their fall-out
onto rivers and mountains. Lacking boundary and
definition I (now as Jack) must reconstruct myself
(mj, especially Mortimer) from diffusion onto
characters in books and myths and band programs.
Where is
this creature (mj) they once tried to supplant with
Christ (i.e., with Mortimer)? If he (mj as Mortimer)
is no longer inside me and a part of me, then he (mj
as Mortimer) is outside somewhere, floating about, preparing a new
assault.
From what
did they protect me (mj) but a part of my own self
(Jack)? And why was I (mj) subject to their veiled
attack?
Is it this
strange me (Mortimer), which has split the western
scene and then scattered, that I (mj as Jack) am
seeking to collect
and re-direct by a north woods retreat?
This is the
body (Mortimer’s), I (Jack) believe, I (Jack) must eat
(in remembrance) to make mine (mj’s).
And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us
(and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only
begotten of the Father), full of grace and truth.4
68.
Such
outrageous notions – and especially these lines perverting
the crucial truth of the communion or mass, the line
poetically replacing Christ’s fleshly body with Mortimer’s
shattered and vaporized one, and proposing that as it
re-incarnated from vaporized into solid flesh it should be
eaten ‘in remembrance’ by Jack – should have made Rev fear
for his son’s sanity. But instead it infuriated him. Not
surprisingly. And after that it depressed him.
His
son misappropriated scripture. He twisted it with
false-poetic and sacrilegious license. The Church, not
long ago, would have publicly executed anyone expressing
such thoughts, burned him at the stake slowly over fresh green
saplings to drag it out excruciatingly to
everyone’s delight. And again Rev could not say it aloud,
but he thought he heard homosexual references.
And
on top of this disgrace, in the next paragraph Jack shot Prof
Platz, the director of the Wrigley College Concert Band,
whom Jack had looked up to. He did it on paper, only, of
course. But it disgusted Rev nevertheless. It was
tasteless and senseless and his son was a shining light to
no one any more.
The
poetry was lost on Rev, but it was not lost on Jack, to
whom the murder (on paper only) was another prankish yet
purposeful
part of an ongoing grand effort to shake Mortimer free of
his mental moorings once and for all, nothing more
sinister than that. Jack had to keep trying shocks of
every kind. No shock so far had been big enough to remake mj to
Jack’s satisfaction. Mj lorenzo’s remaking was far from
accomplished. The roots of dehumanizing Christian
hyper-religion resisted extraction, as did the
philosophical roots of Mortimer’s depressive personality
and of his depersonalized Western-world way of living.
Jack
was convinced by now that mj’s serious personality
imbalance was not
caused primarily by him, Jack. More and more his
tirades were aimed at Mortimer, therefore, not at Rev and
Jo only. Because increasingly he sensed Mortimer was
coming back together; was hovering; and was ‘listening’
and about to take mj over. And Mortimer did not know
‘shytte from Shinola about remaking shampoo’, as an Irish
kid-pundit from a West Philly Catholic high school put it.
69. why analyzing
But
analyzing Jack’s
70. interpreting
Jack’s ‘wanting’ to reunify with Mortimer
Furthermore
most pundits felt after years of study that Jack did not really with all his
heart ‘long for Mortimer’, or ‘wish to be reunited
with his lost half-self’, even though he had written such
things increasingly starting back before
Jack
Lorenzo had spent the
best years of his life deferring to an
intelligent superego
named Mortimer who had hidden behind a mask of cardboard,
a fake persona
in which an ounce of humanity was yet to be found.
Jack had not needed or wanted Mortimer’s intellect or
rules. Ever.
His summer had proven this, most pundits felt. He could
have lived much better without Mortimer’s intellect and
rules. Nor did he look forward to Mortimer’s Western
civilization in
71. the one and
only sad thing to keep in mind while reading
If
you read every paragraph that Jack stuffed into his
That
was why they said as well: in his very next
paragraph it was Mortimer whom Jack wanted dead,
not himself. And the pundits inserted (in parentheses)
mj’s three names and identities into these paragraphs, in
order to explicate the statement fully for everyone:
…Somewhere in my (Jack’s) retreat I (Jack) want
an instant
change of make-up (for mj) such as in this
life occurs only definitely, as I (Jack) can see it,
with death. Yet the death of Prof Platz on paper has
only helped me
(Jack; mj) a little. Maybe I (Jack) know now why I
(Jack) entered the Arctic permafrost in the first
place: to die myself
(Jack? Mortimer?)… and after that, I (Jack)
think, to be reborn (Jack? Mortimer?) remade (mj).5
Why do I hear Abbie Hoffman’s laughter as I
write this, echoing in the concrete streets of
Matthew 4:17 “From that
day Jesus began to proclaim the message, ‘Repent, for the
Jesus.
Maybe that’s what landed ‘upon’ the Buick.
while I
Jack
am imprisoned
within your mind and Mortimer’s and Wrigley’s
Rev
your world
and your church waxing rich and powerful
need not
account for me
but forgetting me you
forget yourself
your
hidden other self
your
self-doubt
self-hate
and
self-destruction
until
without realizing
you
destroy yourself in a fiery explosion
and are
reborn in my generation
setting
out to conquer the world
you are
conquered instead by your own flesh in protest
escaped
from your prison
triumphant
having conquered you
I wait in
Canada
fashioning
firebombs in exile
waiting
for you to invite me back
to face
and forgive and listen
sullen
rejected
collecting
myself
I wait to
be collected
God’s
country
astronaut
country
land of
good and plenty
come and
get me
and come
and get yourself thereby
you have
shunned me until I have grown inward
like a
gnarled blighted vegetable
you
in your
sterile space suits and Cadillacs
in your
clean ranch houses and Chris Craft yachts
you in
your shiny B-52’s and jet phantoms
and you
the bright inventors of gleaming clean precise
anti-personnel
bombs
who live
in impeccable East Coast and
indifferent
to REAL rebirth
it is your
voice that you hear from far off in the frightening
darkness
crying
from the mouth of a deserted cabin in your alter-ego
in a
region of wonderful horrifying primitive wilderness
that you
do not know
where you
have not been
here where
there is no landing strip for your clean machine
no traitor
but your own child
where the
mythologic sun
invisible
to you
burns
truth into his veins without your apprehension
and drives
him to conclusions befitting of his cataclysmic way of
life
and
foreign to your own
from here
he shouts to you
you hear
yourself shouting
to BE
free
to GO
free
to BE
free
not to
extinguish yourself in a pacification program
but to be peace
not to
work at peace
but to be at peace
you have
tried artificially to pacify yourself
so you do
not yet know that peace (myself)
is there within you
and you do
not yet know that you (through me)
are free
that
freedom is (by making peace with me)
what you are
and you do
not yet understand
why I was
once so self-abusive
but am now
self-confident
for you
have not proposed yourself the questions I have
and
because you have created me to ask questions for you
and then
have tried to exile
forget
and
finally destroy me
I will
not be forgotten, exiled, or ever destroyed
I will
become more seductive
as you
have become more aloof
I will
become a whirlpool
when you are becoming like rock
when I
exceed in my devices what your conscience will allow
when my
vague allusions are integrated aptly by you
and you
cut me off and tell yourself that I am in a foreign
country
out here
wandering
about
not you
then I
shall pursue you with my (your own) hidden voice
cursing
and insulting you
you
sterile profligate bum you
listen to
me
as I come
to you
come to me
and make
peace with me before I disturb yours beyond repair
yet for
what you and Mortimer have done to me
Rev
I accept
the blame myself
for I
allowed it to happen
it is I
who now would make it good for us
fully and
finally
in this
confession and appeal I confess to you
who I
(you) have been
in
dissipating grandiosity trying to get my feet back on
the ground
I confess
to you
who now I
am
I appeal
to you expansively
to take me
to yourself again
Jack7
Band Tour
Highlights the Year
It’s Easter break! A
sheaf of directions, a flurry of last-minute preparation,
and we’re on the road!
Illustration: French hornist
riding jubilantly two overturned tympani atop a
cartload of Wrigley-College-Concert-Band-decaled bags
and instruments on a train station platform somewhere
past the
These tours are
unforgettable experiences, full of new places seen, old
friendships deepened, and lessons freshly learned. We
suddenly see the results of a year of labor and prayer.
If the
Backbone of the World is the Rockies, Rev, then the
‘shoulder’ of the
Then: is it
this imperfect Christ (Mortimer) or I myself (Jack)
that I am remaking? Is it he or I myself that had to
die to be reborn?”
This
very last paragraph, said the pundits, suggested that Jack
knew ‘in some form’ of his impending departure and
‘death’, wishing it could have been Mortimer’s departure
and death. The knowledge, they said, was not conscious,
however, but instinctual; premonitory; i.e., sensed via
premonition.
A spring concert, the
Band Banquet, final exams, a commencement concert – and
the year is over! A new slate of officers begins looking
for replacements for departed seniors.
This is where YOU
enter the picture. May we take this opportunity to invite
you to join us at Band Camp this fall… For details see the
enclosed letter. Thank you.
72. the ‘get-well
scrapbook’ and unfunny remainder of
A
raucous and abrupt close to Mortimer’s band program, those
little inspired Concert Band Program notes which had kept
Rev and Jo company for the entire very loud one-man
horn concert they had suffered for way too long now,
should have warned them that something was
finally ending and something else new and contrary was
finally about to come, something quieter and
closer to what they considered normal, maybe even a little
civilized, for once. Any ‘decent’ and ‘normal’ and ‘nice’
person might have hoped for calm and routine by now.
And
therefore the giant get-well ‘card’ that came next in the
envelope, actually a series of big scrapbook pages
plastered with magazine cutout collages, did indeed give
Jo a start, making her sense the civilizing presence of a
woman in the neighborhood of ‘her Jack’, maybe a woman he
had not written about yet.
Unless
it was ‘that Indian
woman’ he had said he would ‘spend the winter with
at
To Mortimer, a Loyal
Band Camper:
The other day I looked
and you weren’t playing your
magazine
cut-out of French horn
and I was
turn page
SAD!
picture of
lovely girl’s face filling an 8.5X11” page with one
lonely inch-long tear creeping down her lonely left
cheek
turn
I opened your
cartoon of
one thin, medium height, brown-haired and pale-faced
frowning college student wedged into an open locker
but you were not in
there
turn
I looked
craggy mountain peaks
high and
billowing sea waves
low
turn
I even tried
a host of
close-up ugly glowering army sergeants with hell-bent
determination carved into their square mugs
just in case, but no
luck
turn
then someone told me
hospital
patient with ENTIRE BODY IN PLASTER CAST AND TRACTION
turn!
I was GLAD!
lovely
laughing face of same girl licking ice cream off her
pretty finger
to know you will soon
be back and before long you will be WITH US!
Love,
From each and every
individual member of the Band.
P.S. Hurry
back!
Had some
beautiful Indian princess in the garb of a Wrigley
co-ed written that to Mortimer and disguised it as a
gift from everybody, attempting to dilute her love? Or
was it truly ‘from the whole band’?... I am going to
believe that it was… both.
Here in the
lakes and forests north of campus, I am allowed to ask
and believe what I please, if it fits and makes me
feel better.
But should
a beautiful girl be GLAD, hearing that I – or Mortimer
– was
incarcerated in a plaster cast?
...................
I have
inserted these band mementoes and the pages of my old
journals, Rev, and have written you these things
merely because they were there inside me, begging for
recognition; and I think you should know, perhaps
because you may never have felt this way, or may not
have realized… the way my universe has been split down
the middle and blown up.
These words
were written for you, Rev, back in your electro-pastel
surge to the suburbs. I have suffered this explosion
hoping to sneak in and shatter your futile rapport
with TV, to bring you to a realization of the FACTS.
Did you know that your own son had gotten this way and
was dying to let you know? Do you read my letters
alone in the night when the Church isn’t looking? As
they sink into your brain, you should gradually feel
that I am somehow you yourself (you profligate sterile
bum, you, you sickly Mortimer-prototype), that I am the self of
yourself you have always avoided.
Were you
appeased by Mortimer’s use of religious phraseology?
He used to overwork certain words and emotions. But
the time has come to laugh at false piety and go free,
and to do this, I (Jack) am returning his embarrassing
former sorrow to you in the mail, as: “Mortimer’s
Sorry Notebooks.” Let his words mollify your good
demon (me, Jack, as I creep back into you), not to
exorcise him (me, Jack) surely, but to love him (me,
Jack), not to subjugate, but to incorporate him (me,
Jack). Let me (mj) into your frozen sterile world,
Rev, just as I am: (Jack without Mortimer).
Jack
………………………..
The man who would
learn the human mind will gain almost nothing from
experimental psychology. Far better for him to put away
his academic gown, to say good-bye to the study, and to
wander with human heart through the world. There, in the
horrors of the prison, the asylum, and the hospital, in
the drinking-shops, brothels, and gambling halls, in the
salons of the elegant, in the exchanges, socialist
meetings, churches, religious revivals, and sectarian
ecstasies, through love and hate, through the experience
of passion in every form in his own body, he would reap
richer store of knowledge than text-books a foot thick
could give him. Then
would he know to doctor the sick with real knowledge of
the human soul.
C. G.
Jung
This
paragraph was a shock treatment for me, Rev, and that,
in part, may be what is wrong with Mortimer’s back.
From its seed of a new spiritual politics suggested by
Jung, I goaded Mortimer to leave books, leave silence,
leave isolation and leave his past and throw himself
and me in ways which even now I can’t admit, upon the
world to “see” it.
But
‘perspective’ broke Mortimer’s back like a poorly
monitored shock treatment, Rev. And in my retreat from
the world to heal, I now long for the quiet, spiritual
creature I once was. Where is Mortimer now? What have
I done to his concentrated piety, but exploded it into
the ether, and beaten it into the earth?
But I think
I’ve failed to eliminate him. I believe I hear him
moaning from the mountaintops still, his spiritual
body strewn across the continent and years, a million
positive charges expecting a lightning storm, begging
for re-assembly from the Appalachians and the Rockies,
to be joined to their negative mates along this river
shoreline, to abandon magnetic chaos and unite,
hail the sun as ONE, and raise their fist and stamp
the earth and hurtle themselves together up
this lonesome valley back to civilization, screaming
the truth in spirit and flesh to you, Rev, and to
everyone back in the Church and the World.
Mortimer,
talk to me now!
You know
how I have been cut off from a part of myself and how
I am coming to
73. Dr. Lorenzo
defends and condemns his
Dr.
Lorenzo, after decades of painful exposure to the pundits’
severe reaction to
He
tried to recall what had made him present himself (Jack)
in this way (as in Jack’s last few lines above, for
example), as embracing
heroically his takeover by Mortimer, and he
thought it must have been a conviction, at that moment,
that it was impossible to go on without Mortimer’s being
re-instated in mj lorenzo in some form.
Dr.
Lorenzo always stood by his conviction that Mortimer would have
had to be included in the final mj in some form. And
he also remained steadfast in his belief that the way they
had come back together had been the right and necessary
way. The only point on which he ever changed his mind was
that: he felt that Jack should have told his parents in
his letters that he was going to be ‘resenting and
resisting’ the takeover, starving or no,
penniless and Bennie-less, or no.
The
Dr. sympathized with those who grieved over this part of
his remaking. He agreed it did not ‘fit’ Jack’s nature
well to welcome Mortimer back, saying, “Talk to me now!”
He admitted, in fact, especially after comprehending how
strongly the pundits felt about it, that every time Jack
welcomed Mortimer back it was ‘kind of bootlicking and
false’. The four last paragraphs, from “I now long for the
quiet, spiritual creature I once was,” to the end of the
section, disgusted him after he had gotten to know his own
work well after years of study. He felt they had to be the
‘hollowest, most falsely acted and written lines’ in the
book. He thought he must have tried to build a transition
to Mortimer’s almost inevitable upcoming return in
On
other occasions he said that Mortimer’s Part II depression
might have started ‘leaking’ into Jack’s Part I, making
Jack feel weak and unduly yielding at this point. Or, as
he would say at times, Jack had been ‘crashing from
speed’.9 In any
case, for whatever combination of dumb reasons, he, mj
lorenzo as ‘Jack’, had ended up doing ‘the wrong thing’,
and had acted all polite and pacifist-heroic, welcoming
‘the enemy’ back, when he should have put up a bit of a
struggle at least.
But
‘no one could undo it now’, as the Dr. liked to remind the
pundits, any more than anybody could undo the
assassination of John Lennon. And besides, even if he had resisted
Mortimer back in ’70, it would have helped very little, in
fact. For Mortimer’s return was as certain as winter’s.
Mortimer had to be given – Dr. Lorenzo always insisted – one more chance
to make up for past sins.
And
Dr. Lorenzo did not like to talk about it much beyond this
point.
His
pundits, however, could not stop talking about it.
74. one group
wants a world of Mortimer-less mjs
During
the early and mid-70’s, therefore, a small group was
formed in response to widespread frustration resulting
from discussion of
And
the group soon disappeared, in fact. Maybe partly because
extreme leftism died a violent death in the U.S. with the
Kent State massacre in 1970, when the Ohio National Guard
unforgivably (and unforgivingly) lowered its rifles and
opened up and mowed down and killed until dead quite a few
students on the green at Kent State University, some of
whom may have been protesting the Vietnam War, but not
all.
YET
EVEN SO!
Up
until
Other
pundits believed the group had continued meeting
‘underground’ and had soon figured out ‘how to accomplish
what it wanted’. Its members were ‘just waiting for the
right moment to resurface and proceed’, more than likely.
Because, as most early Remaking pundits said, the ‘left’,
in general, themselves included, reacted unhappily to Dr.
Lorenzo’s position that ‘Mortimer had to come
back’. Mj lorenzo was the last person on
earth 'the left' wanted to hear saying such a thing. They
just wished and kept
on wishing, year after year, that their mj could
have eliminated
his own Mortimer permanently
and shown everyone else in the world how to do the same.
75. another group
prefers the ‘addiction interpretation’
A
more viable group formed out of the
76. the mainstream
interpretation, after years of sad
In
time, however, the whopping majority of pundits came to
share the adamant position that, if Jack had been close to
giving in to panhandling, just as winter was setting in,
then his upcoming fall from grace at
No
one over the years, in other words, by whatever means
attempted, ever succeeded in ridding
A
fact which gave the smile-forbidding ‘Sunday School
pundits’ and all their kindred lot of Remaking zealots –
their whole dead-serious punditry ilk – a quiet sense of
triumph.
But
meanwhile, unfortunately, plenty of nice-enough-seeming
God-fearing people in the world said
1 The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, or “DSM-IV,” published by the American Psychiatric Association in 1994 (Washington, D.C.), described ‘mania’ or ‘manic episode’ as: “A distinct period of abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive, or irritable mood, lasting at least 1 week…” Also, to officially make the diagnosis of ‘Manic Episode’, at least three or four of the following seven symptoms had to be ‘significantly’ present during the period of mood elevation, said the DSM-IV: “(1) inflated self-esteem or grandiosity; (2) decreased need for sleep (e.g., feels rested after only 3 hours of sleep); (3) more talkative than usual or pressure to keep talking; (4) flight of ideas or subjective experience that thoughts are racing; (5) distractibility (i.e., attention too easily drawn to unimportant or irrelevant external stimuli); (6) increase in goal-directed activity (either socially, at work or school, or sexually) or psychomotor agitation; (7) excessive involvement in pleasurable activities that have a high potential for painful consequences (e.g., engaging in unrestrained buying sprees, sexual indiscretions, or foolish business investments).” And to make the diagnosis the symptoms had to be severe enough to “…cause marked impairment in occupational functioning or in usual social activities or relationships with others, or to necessitate hospitalization to prevent harm to self or others…” Often there world be ‘psychotic features’ to such a ‘manic’ episode, said the DSM-IV.
Given these criteria many pundits since the earliest years thought that mj lorenzo had met the requirements of such a diagnosis and could officially be declared to have suffered a ‘Manic episode’ during the late spring, summer and early fall of 1970. After all, as they said, mj lorenzo’s mood that summer was exceedingly elevated and elated for him; he sounded ‘grandiose’ in his ideas about who he was and what he might accomplish; he slept hardly at all; he may not have talked to anyone because there was no one to talk to most days, but he wrote to his parents constantly day and night and as if ‘pressured’ to do so; his ideas were flying all over creation and it seemed to most pundits that they must have been ‘racing’ inside his head, even though he never complained of such; he treated a truckload of little events (which most people in a normal mood would have considered irrelevant or inconsequential) as if they were of the utmost importance to the survival of humanity, such as his reading of the details of Mackenzie’s trip, just to name one of many; mj was far more excitedly goal-directed in his behavior than he had been when working in his psych internship, which he had treated in a routine and even indifferent way; and finally, symptom number seven: his abandoning his work, his severe addicting drug abuse, his absolutely shameless animal-like nakedness in public spaces, his revved-up sexuality (as evidenced in the Fort Smith material), his stealing major items such as boats, gasoline and rare, antique and very valuable important library books and his sending of a gasoline incendiary bomb in the mail to his parents, not to mention the crazy envelopes themselves with all of their very upsetting content, were all, when combined and accompanied by additional shocking and unusual personal traits, conditions, choices and actions, likely to produce severe and unwanted ‘painful consequences’, no matter how much pleasure such things had given him at the moment he had thought, felt and/or done them.
Nevertheless Dr. Lorenzo over the years always reminded the pundits that they were ignoring “Criterion E” on pg. 332 of the DSM-IV, which clarified the point that you could not diagnose a person as suffering a ‘Manic episode’ if the unusual behaviors and thoughts were due to “…the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication , or other treatment)… Many of Jack’s seemingly ‘manic’ symptoms, if not all, could easily have been caused by his use of speed in the form of Benzedrine, an amphetamine, he said. And furthermore, he added, too many pundits over the years had ignored the fine print on page 332 just below the above line: “Manic-like episodes that are clearly caused by somatic antidepressant treatment (e.g., antidepressant medication, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy) should not count toward a diagnosis of Bipolar I Disorder [or ‘Manic episode’].” Because his lightning electrocution on Logan Pass had truly amounted to a form of ‘electroconvulsive therapy’, ‘shock’ therapy, as most people called it; and living in sunlight 24 hours a day, too, was a psychological shock to his system.
He might well have suffered a ‘kind of’ manic psychosis in 1970, the Dr. admitted, but one caused at least in part by temporary, externally-introduced physical factors such as being struck by lightning, using amphetamines, and taking a long and bizarre and extremely stressful trip into the ‘land of the midnight sun’. Not to forget: maybe also by cultural factors like having been born into a Western world whose worldview and values were so ‘fucked up’ in 1970 as to cause a previously pretty moral nation to immorally, foolishly, uselessly and unconstitutionally murder and maim hundreds of thousands of innocent peasants in Indochina.
Critics, all the same, maintained dismissively throughout the years that mj lorenzo had evidently been “psychotic since before the day he was born.”
Sammy Martinez
probably had the best understanding of Part I of The Remaking,
however. It could be viewed, he said (in a groundbreaking paper
in 1975), as a manic episode; or as a product of amphetamine
abuse; or simply as a perfectly natural and normal human
reaction to having been too stifled by strict rules and
religious mores for 27 straight years. Each one of these
interpretations had to be considered, and ‘in the end no one
interpretation could be ruled either in or out to the exclusion
of the other two’. All three were probably ‘valid
interpretations’. All three had probably ‘happened at once’,
each one feeding into the other. And Sammy based this
‘inclusive’ interpretation on not only Freud’s feeling that a
person’s behavior was usually ‘multiply determined’
rather than caused by any single factor; but also by what Dr.
Lorenzo’s mother had identified as her son’s lifelong fondness
for using a group of words for saying three or four things at
once. In general, said Dr. Martinez (who was a fully trained and
qualified Jungian analyst and psychotherapist as well as a
degreed anthropologist and writer), interpretations of mj
lorenzo’s writing, especially The Remaking, ought to be ‘more
inclusive than exclusive’.
This was consistent with mj’s wish to boil down all
creation into a ‘mandala’, a perfectly rounded and squared
geometric ‘picture’ of life, in the same way that Southwestern
tribes used a given color or direction in their sand paintings
to represent many ideas at once, or that scholars of the I Ching
for thousands of years had successfully used the ‘Later Heaven
Eight Trigrams’ to represent a complete picture of the family;
the cosmology of nature; the directions of the compass; and the
seasons, all simultaneously and at once. In general, Sammy added
(in his introduction to the 1994 Second Revision), interpreters
of mj lorenzo over the years had underestimated the extent to
which his psychic journey during his Remaking year had
paralleled Chinese discoveries over thousands of years as
embodied in the I Ching. Each started with a basic split between
opposites and built up a universe of understanding from there,
layer by layer, accretion upon accretion. One started with Yin
and Yang, the other with Mortimer and Jack. And in fact, he
threw in, ‘in case anyone had not noticed’, Mortimer was Yin and
Jack was Yang. Part I was therefore Yang, Part II was Yin, and
Part III was the unification of those two polar paradigmatic
opposites. And that, he said, was still one more
way of looking at The Remaking; as there would be even more beyond all of
these, some yet to be discovered, without a doubt.
2 In the
legend and lore of the U.S. Southwest’s native tribes ‘Coyote’
was a joker and yet a very high tribal spirit whose bumbling
wandering and tomfoolery led to surprisingly magical results,
even at times to the shocking extent of saving his whole tribe
from annihilation. Carl Jung was one of the first to notice this
and he wrote about it in ‘On the Psychology of the
Trickster-Figure” (1954), which can be found in Archetypes and the
Collective Unconscious (Vol. 9 Part I of Jung’s Collected Works) (New
York: Pantheon, 1959). In literary terms the ‘Coyote’ tales may
be seen as a kind of Native American parallel to western-world
‘picaresque’ ‘novels’ and their ‘antiheroes’ like Lazaro de Tormes,
Cervantes’ Don Quixote
and Thomas Mann’s Felix
Krull.
3 No nobis Dominum is
Latin meaning ‘Not to us, Lord [belongs the praise and glory;
but to You]. The phrase has been used by devout Christians down
through the centuries mostly when something wonderful happened,
such as the USA’s winning the 2nd World War, or the
Cold War, or the assassination of Osama Bin Laden, in order to
keep Christians humble and give the credit to God, especially to
Christ, and especially to the form of God/Christ which is pure
inner spirit, i.e., the Holy Spirit. Jack here is questioning
such a world-view, however, worried it might end up so
self-effacing as to interfere with natural human survival
instinct and intuition, which are Jack’s forte and
métier. Without the clarifying parentheses which pundit
commentators inserted later, Jack’s original went as follows: "'No nobis Dominum', the
expression St. Paul used, Rev, meaning ‘Christ is a sword and a
shield to guard me’, or rather, more extremely, that Christ
replaces and fills me
literally, living within me: such a self-effacing
approach to life may be the very notion that
originates my frantic duality and search for myself.
"If I do not
live within myself, then who does? (If I do not live within
myself, then where
do I?) If I am not writing these lines, then who is?
If I can blame “Christ” for my goodness, then I can accuse the
devil or the communists or Democrats of causing my mistakes. If
I do not live my own life at Wrigley, then Wrigley lives it for
me, and later, perhaps, in a shock of discovery (how?) of who I
truly, truly am, truly:
I explode like a
nuclear warhead.
"Now in my
curious lack of definition I must collect the pieces of this
self from their fall-out onto rivers and mountains. Lacking
boundary and definition I must reconstruct myself from diffusion
onto characters in books and myths and band programs.
"Where is this
creature they once tried to supplant with Christ? If he is no
longer inside me and a part of me, then he is outside somewhere,
floating about, preparing
a new assault.
"From what did
they protect me but a part of my own self? And why was I subject
to their veiled attack?
"Is it this
strange me, which has split the western scene and then
scattered, that I am seeking to collect and re-direct
by a north woods retreat?
"This is the
body, I believe, I must eat (in remembrance) to make mine."
4 (The
Gospel of) John 1: 14, King James version.
5 The
original (without parentheses added by pundits) reads: “…Somewhere in my
retreat I want an instant
change of make-up such as in this life occurs only
definitely, as I can see it, with death. Yet the death of Prof
Platz on paper has only helped me a little. Maybe I
know now why I entered the Arctic permafrost in the first place:
to die myself… and
after that, I think, to be reborn remade.”
6 The
early Remaking pundits quoted these lines to help them remember
and understand what had happened to their entire revolutionary
late-60s generation when it came to the early 70s. Mj’s first
followers, before they discovered The Remaking in late
1971, had attempted – and even somewhat managed – during the 60s
to change the world via external pressure, political
demonstrations, protests in the streets, closing down college
campuses, etc. etc.; but during the early 70s practically all of
this political energy went internal. Dr. Lorenzo was only one of
a great many leaders and thinkers of his day who went from
looking for external solutions to trying to find internal ones
around 1970. Instead of political or military solutions, his
Remaking looked for an internal ‘spiritual’ or ‘moral’ or
‘psychological’ change, a personal transformation; and his
followers understood his pokes at one of their former political
heroes, Abbie Hoffman, to be a reminder to them that it was time to stop
trying to corral the world into complying with the wishes of the
'left', and time instead to look for ways to help individuals to
find inner transformation. In the end, as Dr. Lorenzo taught
over the years, the lessons of The Remaking, the principles of the Remaking ‘cure’,
could be applied to friendships, love relationships, group
conflict and also, and especially important, the conflict and
tension between nations or blocs of nations. You might corral
people into conformity with an apparent resolution of
international (or marital; or group; etc., etc.) conflict by
external political means such as divorce decrees, peace
treaties, etc.; but ultimately an external solution would not
hold unless a parallel inner healing transformation had actually
taken place within the hearts of individual members of those
marriages and blocs of nation-states.
The ancient
Hebrews could be given the Ten Commandments, but they could not
put them to effective use until they had matured enough
spiritually to actually embrace them all-out in their hearts, as
the story of Moses and Aaron and all subsequent Jewish history
tells us.
The next
section beginning “…while I Jack am imprisoned
within your mind and Mortimer’s and Wrigley’s Rev…” gets at the
same idea as the lines about Abbie Hoffman. Each side of a
hyperpolarized duality, if real peace is desired, must first
love, accept and forgive the other side exactly as is. This must
happen within conflict-ridden individuals, within fighting
couples, within fragmented groups, and within opposing blocs of
nation states ALL AT THE SAME TIME, or there will be no lasting
peace. While working on himself, Jack is also reaching out to
Rev looking for some healing between them.
A parallel can
be found as well in King Wen, the Duke of Chou, legendary
founder of the I Ching’s ‘Later Heaven Eight Trigrams’. Captured
and imprisoned by a rival king, as the story goes, he spent
years in his cell exploring internal realms by re-fashioning the
sacred text, the I Ching, and re-molding his own character in
tandem with that re-fashioning. Even when freed from prison he
did not at once seek external revenge by war, but waited ever so
long and carefully until his people were exactly where he wanted
them to be spiritually and in other ways for taking on the rival
kingdom. And in this way King Wen’s people settled the conflict
IN DUE TIME.
Another parallel
may be found in Allen Ginsberg. While at Abbie’s side as Abbie
and his cohorts fired up their young generation demonstrating in
the streets outside the 1968 Democratic Convention, Allen was
one of the first of this revolutionary generation to look for
revolutionary internal
routes to peace instead. When Mayor Daly’s police began
attacking the young demonstrators and some of them began
attacking back, Allen tried to calm the crowd by getting them to
sit down in Grant Park and meditate in loud resonating,
reverberating unison on the ancient Hindu/Buddhist spiritual
syllable, ‘OM’. Many complied wholeheartedly and the useless
bloodbath probably would have been much worse if they had not.
7 Dr.
Lorenzo’s most informed interpreters in the early years liked to
cite this ‘poem’ or ‘political rant’ as more ‘proof’ that in
1970 their hero had been more upset about U.S. warmongering in
Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos than about anything else; and yet
hardly ever mentioned it by name in his Remaking. Eventually
they revised this analysis, feeling that he had been upset not
just about the shameful Vietnam war but about the extreme
hyper-polarization of American society in general, into two
armed camps of extreme left and extreme right which were
fighting with each other desperately to control the USA’s
destiny in the same way that Mortimer (with Rev on his side) and
Jack were fighting with each other to control the destiny of a
split-down-the-middle mj lorenzo.
8
Jacobi, Jolande and Hull, R. F. C., eds., C. G. Jung: Psychological
Reflections, p. 81, drawn from an essay which Jung
originally published at age 37 in 1912. Dr. Lorenzo, however,
suspected that Jung had first thought through and written down
this gem at a much younger age, perhaps while an undergraduate
or medical student, or whenever he was most under the influence
of Nietzsche, an intellectual/spiritual phase which he did
traverse at some point during teens and/or twenties. Today
Jung's 1912 essay may be found on pg. 409, in Two Essays on Analytical
Psychology, which is Vol. 7 of his Collected Works.
9 In this
'look at' mj lorenzo’s The
Remaking, the following words and terms are used
interchangeably and therefore a bit incorrectly, scientifically
speaking: speed, amphetamine, meth, methamphetamine, Bennies,
Benzedrine. A proper breakdown of these terms follows: 'speed'
is the street term for all forms of amphetamine. Methamphetamine
or 'meth' is one form of amphetamine. Benzedrine ('Bennies') is
another. To ‘crash from speed’ is street lingo which means to ‘physically withdraw’
(a medical
term for a medical
condition) from the severely physically addicting drug, ‘speed’,
i.c., any variety of amphetamine; i.e., to 'crash from speed'
means to submit oneself to the ordeal of letting the addicting
chemical leave the body and brain at its own rate and over as
long a period as that takes, usually from a few days (in younger
healthier people) to a few weeks (in older and/or less healthy
people); and typically the visible clinical signs and symptoms
of such amphetamine withdrawal are: acute depression; lethargy;
ravenous hunger; nearly perpetual sleepiness; and irritability;
any or all of which may be severe. In fact a severe withdrawal
after severe addiction, such as the withdrawal or ‘crash’
suffered by mj lorenzo in Fort Smith, often produces temporary psychosis, most often
paranoid and ‘panicky’, and often devolving into violence or
contemplation of same; just as mj’s own severe withdrawal from
heavy amphetamine (Benzedrine) use seems to have done.