Tale 25
He
Married Betty Ann
and
Bought Her a –
Sigmund Freud in 1921 at age 64
creator of
psychoanalysis[1]
“Psychotherapy could fix a man who was unhappy at work.
It could fix even Bill Blackburn
if he would just get with the program and let it...”
Psychotherapy
could fix a man who was unhappy at work. It could fix even
Bill Blackburn if he would just get with the program and let
it, if he would just tell mj, his doctor buddy, about his
egomaniac boss, and answer all his good buddy’s questions
honestly, and completely, then ponder the doctor’s insightful
psychoanalytic interpretations based on ‘transference theory’
and other tricks of the trade. After all, through most of the
twentieth century, Freudian and Jungian analytic-based
psychotherapy, not the Christian religion or any other faith
or thought system or philosophy, had been the big thing
(other than totalitarian despotism or all out war) used the most
by the Western world for trying to ‘improve’ its most
intelligent, creative and artistic people. Mj lorenzo, for
example, as his ‘psycho pundits’ claimed, had been
psychoanalyzed ‘very successfully’ and healed, more or less,
as his pundit devotees claimed, of some grave personal
problems during the long northern winter of his famous
‘Remaking’ drop-out year. And his very famous and amazing
Jungian psychoanalyst had been his own self!
– his own untrained, unrestrained, quarter-baked
shrink-of-a-self, at the time.
By the early
2000s, of course, things would change; as they were bound to
do in a teenagerish American culture in rapid hormonal flux;
and so, by the early 2000s hardly anyone would mention
psychoanalytic psychotherapy any more, Freudian or Jungian, as
a way to solve problems or change people’s lives. But in 1974
the field of psychiatry had not yet suffered the competitive
blow it was about to, the sudden invention of dozens of new
kinds of therapies and New Age ‘religions’. Most of these
‘alternative’ approaches, these therapies and self-improvement
schemes other than Freudian and Jungian that were to become so
popular in the
Psychiatrists
like Dr. Lorenzo did not try to help patients by turning them
to the Bible or church any more, of course. That was barbaric,
anathema, philistine, against the rules of the profession. It
was considered a mis-use of one’s powerful position as doctor,
to take advantage of a patient’s relative weakness and
confusion so as to proselytize religion upon her or him;
unless, of course, the patient absolutely insisted on such an
approach. Jungian psychoanalysis, however, and interestingly,
was distinctly different from Freudian in its understanding of
the roots of human psychology and mental illness, and often
did refer patients gently back to their own inner religious
roots in search of deeper and more meaningful Self-understanding,
as did a few other New Age therapies that would become common
soon.
And as for
Native American religion, the field of psychotherapy had only
just barely begun to even imagine, as of yet, that any tricks
for healing the psyche might be found in such a place. The
idea of using shamanic techniques as a kind of psychotherapy
had hardly been thought of in ‘74. Interest in shamanism would
become a widespread cultural fad in the Western world soon
enough, but not yet. Castaneda's books were out by '74, the
first famous few. His very first had appeared in the late
sixties, but mj would hear nothing of them until after ’75,
when he moved to
Until the night
of this interview, therefore, the main ways of responding to
‘tyranny’ in the workplace or tyranny anywhere, to mj’s knowledge,
were (1) collective but veiled underground resistance; (2)
war; (3) revolution; (4) Christ-like turning of the other
cheek; (5) open symbolic nonviolent resistance Ghandi-style;
(6) Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy; and (7) psychoanalysis.
Certainly no one in ’74 had access to Fire from Within,[2]
the book Castaneda would put out ten years later in '84, in
which the Yaqui Indian wise man and seer, don Juan, would show
UCLA student Carlos how ‘men of knowledge’ could put to good
use (with delight and rip-off ‘glee’) a 'petty tyrant' like
Fred Waring for incredibly high-speed personal growth. If that
brilliant piece of wisdom had been available, mj might have
seen Bill Blackburn in a more Native American light at this
point in the interview, maybe even in a shamanic light.
Years later –
yes – mj lorenzo would
discover that don Juan and Bill Blackburn both, though
thousands of miles apart and unaware of each other, could,
both of them, lay out in
great detail a hate-free, nonviolent psychological
strategy for handling a ‘petty tyrant’, someone who lorded it
over them mercilessly, and abusively. IF mj had
picked up on this tiny hint in ‘74, he MIGHT have guessed that
the similar views of these two wise men had possibly come from
a common source, ancestral Native American oral wisdom, a
shared tradition going back thousands of years; AND, he MIGHT
have paid more attention to the fact that all of Bill’s
colleagues at Decca had warned him about Fred, and that Bill
had taken Fred on willfully
all the same, convinced that he already knew, unlike them, how
to deal with such a ‘petty tyrant’ (Castaneda’s term);[3]
AND it MIGHT have occurred to mj that not just a shamanic
Yaqui teacher like Castaneda’s don Juan fully trained in
personal self-mastery, but even a wise half-Huron like Bill,
though cut off from his tribe for most of his adult life,
could easily have absorbed from Native American forebears
(especially his mother) during childhood large chunks of
shamanic knowledge and skill that Western civilization knew
little about.
During the second
interview, in fact, mj would
learn that Bill’s mother had taken him, when he was a kid, to
visit his Huron relatives, and done so every summer for many
weeks, giving him plenty of exposure to their traditional
knowledge. But still,
even after the second interview provided him with such
information, it was many more years before mj comprehended the
significance of such a childhood. Foreign-culture
comprehension was a gigantic task, apparently, even for mj
lorenzo, back in those days. And as he gained in
understanding, over the decades, he would update his
Waring/Blackburn writings with additions and corrections.
AND: if he had
grasped the significance of all these things in ’74, it MIGHT
have occurred to mj that Bill, being not just American Indian,
but also quite psychologically hip in ways very strange to the
Western world, just like Castaneda’s don Juan, MIGHT well have
kept the 'petty
tyrant' Fred around on purpose all those years, as
long as he had needed him, and selfishly, with delight and
‘glee’, for no reason but his own self-growth and amusement.
Had mj known or thought about any of these things, THEN MAYBE,
instead of psychoanalyzing his poor friend Bill, without
Bill’s knowledge, and trying to psychoanalyze Bill’s boss,
Fred, along with him, instead of trying to uncover a hidden
sickness or ‘neurosis’ in their relationship, so as to lay out
the sick neurotic bugaboo and de-spook it, so that Bill could
keep on working for Fred despite it, instead of all that
complicated psychoanalytic gobbledygook, he might have
suggested to Bill, merely, that he would probably find a ‘petty
tyrant’ like Fred useful for a little longer, for
a few more years, maybe, and probably could use Fred’s tyranny
for his own further self-growth and all out fun.
"Did you find a petty tyrant yourself, don Juan?"
"I was lucky. A
king-size one found me. At the time, though, I felt like you;
I couldn't consider myself fortunate."[4]
That would have
been a simpler approach; funnier; and a way almost perfectly
suited to Bill's Bronze-Age-Warlord tastes and fascinations,
including his sense of humor, compared with Freudian analytic
psychotherapy, which fit him as well as a smelly step-sister’s
shoe.
Now: it
certainly was also true, as pundits reminded, that mj lorenzo
had written The
Remaking during his ‘Remaking year’ of 70-71; and it
certainly was true as well, that this ‘word-mandala’ of a book
that he had called The
Remaking had contained goldmines of wisdom and tricks he
should have been able to tap into, on this night of the first
Blackburn interview, if only he had wanted; and this point was
the loudest hue and cry the Remaking pundits
raised when they first read Tales of Waring in
1981 and saw that he had done ‘nothing of the sort’. Mj lorenzo, as they
complained to each other, and to the press and the author
himself, eventually, had been one of the first in the Western
world to discover the potential psychotherapeutic benefit of
hanging out with a caring shaman friend. He had spent the long
winter of 70-71 with a shaman friend to his spiritual and
emotional benefit, and had even married the shaman friend’s
granddaughter, Dlune. And mj’s internal division into two
halves, ‘Jack’ and ‘Mortimer’, during that year, the former
rebelling cleverly against the tyrannical latter, had taught
him and the world nothing if not a formula for dealing with a
‘petty tyrant’; and thus, in a number of ways, The Remaking had been
ahead of its time, as the Remaking pundits
clamored; it had been far ahead of Castaneda’s 1984 Fire from Within in
the way the Remaking’s ‘Jack’ had ‘psyched out’ his ‘petty
tyrant’, ‘Mortimer’, for example, the pundits insisted. So...:
why in the world had mj not used his own Remaking-year
discoveries to help his friend, Bill, on the night of this
interview? It was one more big question the Remaking pundits
asked when Tales of
Waring first tore through the underground via their
elaborate worldwide underground Abercrombie-and-Fitch
Hippie-professor-and-student network in 1981.
But they had
forgotten, of course, or were only just beginning to grasp
(for they had only just unearthed mj a year before, in 1980),
the extent to which mj lorenzo himself, the author of the now
world-famous Bible of self-reform, The Remaking, had minimized the importance
of that book immediately upon completing it, amazingly.
Despite all the psychic trauma that the Remaking trip and
book had put him through for that whole ‘remaking year’ of
70-71 – or maybe because of that trauma – and despite the
obvious ways it had changed him (not the least having been
that he had met and married Dlune) – or maybe because of all these
reasons – he had put The
Remaking out of mind and forgotten it completely once
the trip was over; and then when he and Dlune had moved to the
Poconos in June of 72, he had left it in a box in a closet at
Spring Lake, where they lived, a box on top of which he would
routinely throw his dirty socks; until, on the night of the
present interview in ’74, he had practically forgotten The Remaking even
existed. Whereas the pundits, in the meantime, having
discovered it in ‘71 without his knowledge (thanks to his
father’s releasing it underground) and having analyzed it to
the nth degree and further spread it underground, were far
more aware of its value than mj was: particularly during the
70’s, the one decade of its existence during which history
would show eventually that mj lorenzo, its author, had
underestimated and forgotten its value most thoroughly. The
‘early Remaking pundits’ were the ones who had been forced to
take it upon themselves, therefore, to dig mj out of obscurity
in the Poconos and out of his retreat from the realm of his
mission and disciples, finally, and reveal to him in 1980 what
an atom bomb of a blockbuster he had created in The Remaking; and
what a heap of madly devoted followers they themselves were;
and only then would
he begin to discover its value, finally.
And then Sammy
would help him prepare Tales
of Waring too for publication, and they would release it
in an early version a year later, in ’81.
The three
interviews were in 1974, before all of that, and so mj was
still in ’74 underestimating himself and his writing; and
therefore he had forgotten most if not all of his Remaking
discoveries; and on this night of this first interview, at the
present point in the proceedings, as a result, he could think
of no better method for getting to the bottom of Bill’s sudden
and disconcerting change in attitude toward Fred, than his
darn old Freudian psychoanalytic psychotherapist shtick; and
that was a pretty worn out old cliché of an
intellectual system by ’74, sadly. Worse yet, mj
was a stupid novice klutz at Freudian psychoanalysis, as the
night would show. He had a little less than a year of
post-med-school psychiatry training at that point; and that
year of internship psych training had revealed some personal
problems, as a matter of fact, that might interfere with his
practicing the trade. He had suffered a kind of ‘nervous
breakdown’ close to the end of that year, and talked to
himself on the street in two different voices. He had dropped
out and disappeared to northwest
No: sadly for
peace on earth and fairy tales, mj was still learning Sigmund
Freud's psychoanalysis at this point. Worse yet, sophomoric
knowledge of the powerful tool had gone to his head. He
thought he had power he did not have. He was a sorcerer’s
apprentice dressed in friendly, colorful peacenik garb; and he
was playing with powers appropriate for only a master of the
complex and dangerous art of mental and emotional healing, and
not appropriate for a novice
to play with.
If poor Bill
Blackburn sensed any of this, he said not a word, however, and
mj proceeded to ‘psychoanalyze’ his own friend without telling
him.
Bill, with the
same kind of formal gravity he had shown all night whenever he
handed mj one promotional item or another from the Waring
Organization office, passed him now a formal 1973 press
announcement of his own creating, grammatical errors and all,
that had given the artist Fred his due, or tried to, at least.
Fred
Who............???
Although no
name looms larger than Fred Waring's in the annals of modern
musical entertainment, it is often omitted from lists of
"big band" leaders. This is not a lack of recognition, nor
an oversight. In show business circles Waring is rated as
much more than a band leader….
Mj looked up at
his patient, hoping he would explain for his doctor, please,
as mj had asked him to do, why he would quit working for Fred
Waring if Fred had ‘mellowed’; and if Bill had no income. Why
quit working for someone who deserved the kind of adulation
Bill’s own press announcements showed that Fred deserved? But
Bill began again before mj could ask.
"You see," Bill
said, "what had happened was, up until a certain point, and I
made sure of this," Bill was firm about it: "I made Fred
Waring look for me; I didn't go to him; ever."
Bill wanted to
describe his kind of 'psychological finesse' for dealing with
a dictatorial man like Fred Waring. The McGill (in
Don Juan explained that
the mistake average men make in confronting petty tyrants is
not to have a strategy to fall back on…[6]
"I tried to
remain a mystery to that man," Bill said, "so he didn't know
how much money I was worth. And at one point we were downtown
and-HAH!-he tried to sell me his building. And
I was standing there with twenty bucks in my pocket
and," Bill shook, censoring a laugh, "he's talking a hundred
thousand dollars: 'It's a good buy, Bill!' And
I went along with it. And Paul, his son, was goin',"
Bill gestured frantically, "because Fred was really layin' it
on me. I remained a mystery to him until," Bill
looked at Betty Ann, "she; and I."
Jolted by this,
Betty Ann spilled the beans. She jumped ahead of her husband’s
story again, past any build-up or suspense Bill might have
planned, tromping on any other thought he might have intended
to pursue, right to what she assumed was about to be his
million-dollar punch line: "And," she said, "after you bought
this house, he knew you didn't have a dime!" She laughed
unreservedly for once, and more caustically than usual. "A da-hime!"
She clutched her glass and showed six intense
emotions in succession, glancing sidelong at Bill, while beans
spilled and rolled everywhere.
Bill was very
kind to his little wifey-poo, even though she trespassed on
his sacred precinct of storytelling. Her heart was right,
after all. Her caustic edge was for Fred, not Bill, who loved
her unspeakably. He scraped the beans together and shoveled
them to mj, adding a few: "And,” he said: “the worst thing you
can do with Fred… is let him see a chink in your armor, in any
way."
....the fatal flaw [don
Juan continued] is that average men take themselves too
seriously; their actions and feelings, as well as those of the
petty tyrants, are all-important.[7]
Betty Ann
spilled even more. "If you have a lot of money," she clarified
more explicitly than Bill, "you can get by with a lot with
Fred."
Mj took to the
spill like a starved puppy. "Then do you think you lost ground
with Fred – ..."
"Oh!"
"...since you
got this house?"
"Oh!
Absolutely!" Betty Ann exclaimed.
"Oh my God,"
Bill added very gravely, "I've gone down in his eyes immensely."
She looked over
granny half-rims, tightening blond eyebrows: "When he found
out that Bill doesn't have money?!" She actually bit her glass.
"So: now –. Oh;
really?" Mj was shocked; skeptical. "He reacts differently to
you now?" He juggled this hot potato. He just could not
believe it somehow. How could a divine
musician be an immature baby of a man about a purely
materialistic item such as filthy lucre, MONEY? or see a
beautiful warm little loving home as just a house, just a material thing???
Were they distorting, or was it true?
Bill nodded.
"Well you know how I operated with Fred? Instead of going to
him with an idea, I'd go in the studio with a whole orchestra,
send him a tape and say, 'Whuddyou think’? And he's
thinkin', 'This sonuvabitch went into a studio and PAID
for it’. W'l I didn't pay for it, I had the orchestra
at my disposal, y'know?"
What was the
psychoanalytic meat of the matter, the Jungian jewel in the
cowflop?
Mj said, "You
can't put it over on Fred any more, huh?"
"I never even
tried to put it over."
Warriors, on the other
hand, not only have a well-thought-out strategy, but are free
from self-importance.[8]
"And I never
went up to him and said, 'Can I draw a hundred’? And," Bill
sighed wearily, thinking maybe about the times he could have
used a loan, but knew that asking for one would ruin
everything, "I didn't realize it for a long, long
time; but when I started goin' with Bett he saw, when
she was livin' with Poley and Yvette, that I didn't
have money. Until then, the honest truth is he didn't
know."
What restrains their
self-importance is that they have understood that reality is
an interpretation we make.[9]
Mj asked, "Did
he think you did have money?"
"I didn't try
to. He must've."
"Mmmm, but you
weren't consciously trying to make him think it?"
"No. Not at
that time. No."
Bill stood up
and headed for the bathroom without excusing himself.
Betty Ann left
for the kitchen.
The world
famous writer who didn’t know he was world famous and didn’t
know how to interview for a book, read more Fred Waring press
release gimmicks:
Fred Waring
ranks at the top as an innovator, a renaissance man of the
music profession. He introduced the chorus to big time
vaudeville; he fought traditional conservatism and made
radio history with large costly musical broadcasts; he and
his Pennsylvanians starred in motion pictures as soon as
sound techniques were developed to produce big musicals; he
rocked TV with the first musical spectaculars and then
deserted television for the concert stage, touring the
nation for 24 years (as of 1973), playing before overflow
crowds in legitimate theaters and auditoriums, and winning
the award of
No, not since
college days has Waring worn the restrictive mantle of "band
leader!"
"Bill," Betty
Ann shouted from the kitchen, toward the bathroom, "I could
see where a person would get that impression." She clattered
glasses and bottles. "You used to come in with all these
stories about the restaurant you had and the airplane you
had."
"No, but I
didn't ever tell Fred that!" came from the bathroom.
Ice trays
clanged.
Bill was in the
cherry-framed mirror now, his coarse white hair fluffing out,
his white shirt and khakis unable to hide the extra weight
they covered. "No, that's another thing," he said to mj,
standing right behind him now. "I usta fly up here to see
Fred, ah heh, with my own plane." He laughed and got
to his throne chair with face puffed, as if his blood pressure
had risen again. "And Fred saw that, and that's where
he got that too."
"Sure!" Betty
Ann chimed from somewhere.
Mj gave up
juggling their hot potato and bean offerings and solemnly,
delicately, respecting his friends and wanting to trust them,
he nuzzled this hot potato of theirs into a pile next to the
beans Betty Ann had spilled and started noshing on it.
"This is really
something," he said, "to think that the fact that you would
get married and buy a little house would kill it with Fred."
Impressed with
his bovine puppy appetite, Bill offered him seconds.
"Well! Ya know what he said!"
Mj said, "That
is really strange!"
It was hard to
swallow. After all, he had idolized the man since he was six,
programmed by his parents and TV at an impressionable age, to
see Fred Waring as a culture hero and a culture saint. It was
even more strange, because everybody knew – didn’t they? –
that money had nothing to do with real personal worth?
If anything, it made you less truly human,
didn’t it, to be mammon-grubbing? ‘You cannot serve God and
mammon,’ Christ had said, but the truth was that mj lorenzo
had spent most of his life with simple homespun
salt-of-the-earth people thus far, and lacked experience with
the ‘filthy rich’.
"You know what
he said to people, to show ya, he said, 'He married
–‘." Bill lowered his voice. He delivered the line as Fred
would have said it to one of his Pennsylvanians, quietly and
in measured bites: 'He married
Betty Ann,... and bought her... a SHACK'!"
Bill frowned
and squinted. "I never said a word to him about it then, but
when we had a confrontation I threw it up at him. I said,
'That's been irritating me'."
This couldn't
be the meat mj was after, could it? It had to be just another
hot potato rolling into beans.
Bill sighed.
"No, it really shook him that we bought this house. Do
you know that even when we were livin' over next to you,"
Bill eyed Betty Ann as she entered, "y'know, next to mj and
Dlune:..."
"Yeh," she
said.
"…that was a
big enough house and everything," he said, "to still impress
him."
Mj studied
these seconds which Bill had dumped on his plate, so to speak,
still unable to find the meat of the matter. He sniffed and
even listened
like a trained hound. Not a clue. His life experience had not
prepared him for this. He had been raised and educated by –
and around – standard, normal, ordinary American citizens,
upper middle class at best.”
"Oh, yeh,"
Betty Ann stood right over mj now, too, smiling right down at
him fondly. "He was happy with that one."
It worked: mj
picked up the scent again.
"Does he –;
does he actually respect you less?"
"Oh yes," said
Bill, sipping.
"He treats you
with less respect!?"
His bloodhound
puppy circuits were on overload.
Betty Ann
nodded and sat down sipping.
The meat of the
matter stank. He said, "That takes the cake, of all the
stories you've told me!" How could Fred Waring respect Bill
Blackburn less
over a house?
Wasn’t Bill one of the most respect-worthy men in the world?
Betty Ann now
rolled her pal mj a whole skinned raw shank as reward for all
of his surprise and disbelief. He was asking for it, wasn’t
he?
"Well I think
that a big part of it too, Bill,” she said, “is that after we
started goin' together, you became more mysterious, in a different way." Her
bright eyes brightened more and she sat up, arranging pleats
in her dark jumper skirt. "And I've seen him do this with
other couples." She took a sip and her eyes sparked, then
darkened. "No matter how much he likes either one or both,
they go down in his eyes if they get married and they're in
his group. That's it!"
Oh no!
The first
course of reality, the spilled beans about Fred’s caring
whether Bill ‘had a dime’, had shocked mj; the next
course, the hot potato that Fred actually respected
Bill less for ‘not having a dime’, had thrown him for a
loop; and then the meat of the matter, Fred’s condemning
their cozy, love-filled home as ‘a shack’, had really been too shameful to absorb.
But this raw shank from Betty Ann about Fred’s resenting all
couples who fell in love and married while employed by him unhinged the interviewer to the point that he lost all
appetite for any of the morsels of Fred Waring truth still
left in the world to be tasted or sniffed. His heart pounded.
Hercules and
the stately earth goddess could haze him into their rebel cult
any way they wanted, from now on. He had no defense for the
man.
How could the
young shrink Dr. Lorenzo want to talk Bill into working for
Fred now? He wouldn’t work for Fred himself. He couldn’t
defend the man for five minutes, let alone all night. Fred’s
defense was doomed.
He searched the
press release knowing it could never help him defend the
‘renaissance man of the music profession’, Fred Waring,
against the allied Huron-and-Swedish-orphan onslaught. It was
heartbreaking, almost.
It's hard to
pin down a man with so many talents. People who've attended
his Music Workshop at Delaware Water Gap know him as an
inspiring teacher and a driving perfectionist; young
hopefuls who aspire to professional careers and audition for
him discover a wise and sympathetic listener albeit a stern
disciplinarian, intent on helping them develop into
competent performers. Dozens of former Pennsylvanians have
moved on to heights of individual stardom. One wonders how
much they owe to that consummate craftsman named Waring!
Betty Ann
frowned, smiling. "I don't know what that does to him. He just
can't stand it!"
She darkened.
And then she
remembered something. "Once he told me!" She sat up again,
ready to own this line, one hundred percent. "He said,” and
she portrayed Fred as playful, but hurt, “‘because –…: then
it's two against one; and that's not fair’!”
"Ah hah
that's not FAIR,"
Bill choked on it laughing. "That's not fair ha-hahhhhhhh!"
She mocked with
the dignified playful restraint with which Fred Waring had
said those very oedipal[10]
words to her. She eyed Bill and ended up looking at mj. "Yeh:
that's why he doesn't like it."
Mj groaned at
the sickening dinner table of leftovers reflecting so badly on
Fred, and now at this statement of Fred’s which sounded so
childish and ‘oedipal’ in Freudian terms. He wanted to vomit
every morsel of Fred Waring fairy tale, and reality, both,
that he had ever been stupid enough to swallow.
He needed
serious relief from crazy
A quote from
a
Waring Is Still
The Best.
Fred Malcolm
Waring, still standing behind mj, had remained silent through
all of this disgusting multiple-course banquet, all of these
bull-dog-chow revelations about him, the great Fred Waring,
offered to that poor puppified bull-cow, mj lorenzo.
Mj’s tail was
frozen between his legs. How must such an oedipally
out-of-control Fred Waring have treated his mother and father
when he was little?! How had his mother and father treated
him?! The interviewer’e gut churned contemplating the
possibilities, and out of his mouth popped another item
regrettable for the foundering, virtually hopeless Waring
defense and golden tale. He said with drama unusual for him,
"He must have been some child!!!!”
"He was nothing in
comparison to the real monsters that the new seers faced
during the [Spanish] Conquest [of Mexico, don Juan continued,
still explaining to Carlos the benefit of having a ‘petty
tyrant’]. By all indications those seers enjoyed themselves
blue dealing with them. They proved that even the worst
tyrants can bring delight, provided, of course, that one is a
warrior."[12]
[1] Encyclopedia Britannica, article on ‘Sigmund Freud’, image: Mary Evans/Sigmund Freud Copyrights (courtesy of W.E. Freud).
[2] Carlos Castaneda,
Fire from Within,
[3] Op. cit. See the chapter “Petty Tyrants.”
[4] Castaneda, op. cit., p. 20. From chapter 2, “Petty Tyrants.”
[5] Bruce Trigger, The Children of Aataentsic, p. 70: “Nothing... was as desirable as to be credited with the capture of an enemy warrior. Women and children who were captured were usually tortured and killed on the spot and their heads or scalps kept as trophies. The scalps were tanned and, in time of war, were fastened onto poles and set upon the walls of villages to frighten attackers. The same fate might befall able-bodied men, if too many were captured or their presence otherwise endangered their captors’ security. Usually, however, captured warriors became the victims of a sadistic game, in which hopes of escape or reprieve were balanced off against physical pain and the greater likelihood of a savage, if glorious death. In their treatment of such prisoners the Huron revealed a sinister aspect of the psychological finesse which was an important facet of their culture.” (Italics and bold large type ours.) See Bibliography.
[6] Castaneda, op. cit., p. 24. From chapter 2, “Petty Tyrants.”
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Sigmund Freud taught that the ‘Oedipus Complex’ occurred in all children worldwide approximately 3-5 years of age, and consisted in this: that the child fell in love and remained in love with the parent of the opposite sex, until he or she finally realized that that parent of the opposite sex was already taken by the parent of the same sex as the child, and willingly gave up the improper love pursuit. A child who never successfully completed this emotional task by giving up that improper pursuit would go through life experiencing difficult relationships with both sexes, especially in the case of friendships with couples who were friends. A common example of an adult neurosis caused by an ‘unresolved Oedipal issue’ would be a man who repeatedly fell in love with women who already had a committed male partner. Another example might be a man who repeatedly fell in love with women who reminded him of his mother. Freud first introduced the theory in his 1899 masterwork, The Interpretation of Dreams.
The ‘Oedipal’ ‘complex’ is named for Oedipus, a character from Greek mythology or legend, who (unwittingly) killed his father and married his mother. The most famous presentation of the tale was the play Oedipus (later called Oedipus Rex) by the ancient Athenian Greek playwright Sophocles, a tragic play of around 429 B.C. which Friedrich Nietzsche studied in his Birth of Tragedy. Nietzsche used the play to forward his argument that ‘great’ or ‘noble’ humans (such as creative artists or culture heroes) ‘do not sin’, no matter how violently they upturn their contemporary system of values: “Sophocles understood the most sorrowful figure of the Greek stage, the unfortunate Oedipus, as the noble human being who, in spite of his wisdom, is destined to error and misery, but who eventually, through his tremendous suffering, spreads a magical power of blessing that remains effective even beyond his decease. The noble human being does not sin, the profound poet wants to tell us: though every law, every natural order, even the moral world may perish through his actions, his actions also produce a higher magical circle of effects which found a new world on the ruins of the old one that has been overthrown. That is what the poet wants to say to us insofar as he is at the same time a religious thinker.” Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy, p. 67f. See Bibliography.
We add these comments of Nietzsche’s not to overburden the present ‘look at mj lorenzo’s second book Tales of Waring’ with verbiage to make us appear more scholarly, but to possibly add some helper thoughts to a reader’s efforts to sort out and comprehend complex, multi-faceted, dark-and-light, seemingly-both-good-and-bad (to some) artists or culture heroes such as Fred Waring or mj lorenzo.
Nietzsche, for more than 140 years now (as of 2018), ever since the first edition of his first book, The Birth of Tragedy in 1872, has been panned by thoughtful analysts on nearly every side of every modern issue, and for this reason has often been dismissed as so unclear in his positions that he can be used by almost anybody to argue for or against almost any side of any argument. (Hitler used him, for example, to support his argument that the Germans were a ‘super race’ or ‘a race of supermen’.) Nevertheless, like the ‘noble’ individual Nietzsche describes here, even if Nietzsche’s thinking was immoral at times as some have claimed, he has by his published writing stimulated probably more thought and discussion than any other modern philosopher or writer/thinker: thoughts like these just quoted above from Nietzsche should definitely be considered by anyone attempting to comprehend complex, multi-faceted, light-and-dark, mixed-good-and-bad (so-seeming to some) powerful, culture-changing artists, writers, thinkers, sages, political leaders or culture heroes such as Waring, Lorenzo, Martin Luther King, Carl Jung, Allen Ginsberg, Carlos Castaneda, Nietzsche, Jesus, Moses, Guru Maharaj Ji, Gandhi, Tolstoy, Abraham Lincoln, Robert E. Lee, Hercules, Dionysus, Demeter, Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Bolivar, Hernan Cortez, Mandela, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Mao Tse Tung, Coyote and many more besides this random smattering.
[11] The 50th anniversary year of Fred’s being in show business was 1966-67. He always counted his start as an Entertainer as being the month when he and his brother Tom joined Poley McClintock and Freddy Buck, turning that two-man noise machine into a 4-man banjo band, and that occurred in July, 1917, when Fred had just turned 17. See Virginia Waring’s book, pp 26-27.
[12] Castaneda, op.
cit., p. 24. From chapter 2, “Petty Tyrants.”